MKTX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BitMine Immersion Technologies has a net margin of 7.22% compared to MarketAxess Holdings's net margin of -76.24%. MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 16% beat BitMine Immersion Technologies's return on equity of -88.47%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a consensus price target of $236.75, signalling upside risk potential of 5.11%. On the other hand BitMine Immersion Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MarketAxess Holdings has higher upside potential than BitMine Immersion Technologies, analysts believe MarketAxess Holdings is more attractive than BitMine Immersion Technologies.

MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 0.844, which suggesting that the stock is 15.556% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BitMine Immersion Technologies has a beta of 0.568, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.17%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. BitMine Immersion Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MarketAxess Holdings pays 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. BitMine Immersion Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues are $208.6M, which are larger than BitMine Immersion Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.5M. MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $15.1M is higher than BitMine Immersion Technologies's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, MarketAxess Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.17x while BitMine Immersion Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MarketAxess Holdings is 10.38x versus 4.04x for BitMine Immersion Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morgan Stanley has a net margin of 7.22% compared to MarketAxess Holdings's net margin of 26.13%. MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 16% beat Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 13.75%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a consensus price target of $236.75, signalling upside risk potential of 5.11%. On the other hand Morgan Stanley has an analysts' consensus of $124.92 which suggests that it could fall by -3.53%. Given that MarketAxess Holdings has higher upside potential than Morgan Stanley, analysts believe MarketAxess Holdings is more attractive than Morgan Stanley.

MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 0.844, which suggesting that the stock is 15.556% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.294, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.405%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Morgan Stanley offers a yield of 2.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. MarketAxess Holdings pays 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Morgan Stanley pays out 45.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues are $208.6M, which are smaller than Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues of $16.5B. MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $15.1M is lower than Morgan Stanley's net income of $4.3B. Notably, MarketAxess Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.17x while Morgan Stanley's PE ratio is 15.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MarketAxess Holdings is 10.38x versus 3.47x for Morgan Stanley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 7.22% compared to MarketAxess Holdings's net margin of 34.1%. MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 16% beat Charles Schwab's return on equity of 14.02%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a consensus price target of $236.75, signalling upside risk potential of 5.11%. On the other hand Charles Schwab has an analysts' consensus of $92.37 which suggests that it could grow by 5.73%. Given that Charles Schwab has higher upside potential than MarketAxess Holdings, analysts believe Charles Schwab is more attractive than MarketAxess Holdings.

MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 0.844, which suggesting that the stock is 15.556% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.938, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.245%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Charles Schwab offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. MarketAxess Holdings pays 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues are $208.6M, which are smaller than Charles Schwab quarterly revenues of $5.6B. MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $15.1M is lower than Charles Schwab's net income of $1.9B. Notably, MarketAxess Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.17x while Charles Schwab's PE ratio is 26.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MarketAxess Holdings is 10.38x versus 7.82x for Charles Schwab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Virtu Financial has a net margin of 7.22% compared to MarketAxess Holdings's net margin of 11.9%. MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 16% beat Virtu Financial's return on equity of 21.87%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a consensus price target of $236.75, signalling upside risk potential of 5.11%. On the other hand Virtu Financial has an analysts' consensus of $41.67 which suggests that it could grow by 1.31%. Given that MarketAxess Holdings has higher upside potential than Virtu Financial, analysts believe MarketAxess Holdings is more attractive than Virtu Financial.

MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 0.844, which suggesting that the stock is 15.556% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Virtu Financial has a beta of 0.681, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.895%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Virtu Financial offers a yield of 2.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. MarketAxess Holdings pays 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Virtu Financial pays out 108.32% of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Virtu Financial's is not.

MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues are $208.6M, which are smaller than Virtu Financial quarterly revenues of $837.9M. MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $15.1M is lower than Virtu Financial's net income of $99.7M. Notably, MarketAxess Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.17x while Virtu Financial's PE ratio is 11.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MarketAxess Holdings is 10.38x versus 1.17x for Virtu Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.