SIEB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a net margin of 29.96% compared to Siebert Financial's net margin of -2.25%. Siebert Financial's return on equity of 21.91% beat Mawson Infrastructure Group's return on equity of -1202.4%.

Siebert Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mawson Infrastructure Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 421.65%. Given that Mawson Infrastructure Group has higher upside potential than Siebert Financial, analysts believe Mawson Infrastructure Group is more attractive than Siebert Financial.

Siebert Financial has a beta of 0.503, which suggesting that the stock is 49.665% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mawson Infrastructure Group has a beta of 3.937, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 293.743%.

Siebert Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mawson Infrastructure Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Siebert Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mawson Infrastructure Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Siebert Financial quarterly revenues are $28.9M, which are larger than Mawson Infrastructure Group quarterly revenues of $13.8M. Siebert Financial's net income of $8.7M is higher than Mawson Infrastructure Group's net income of -$310.9K. Notably, Siebert Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.87x while Mawson Infrastructure Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Siebert Financial is 2.03x versus 0.19x for Mawson Infrastructure Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MarketAxess Holdings has a net margin of 29.96% compared to Siebert Financial's net margin of 7.22%. Siebert Financial's return on equity of 21.91% beat MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 16%.

Siebert Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MarketAxess Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $236.83 which suggests that it could grow by 8.71%. Given that MarketAxess Holdings has higher upside potential than Siebert Financial, analysts believe MarketAxess Holdings is more attractive than Siebert Financial.

Siebert Financial has a beta of 0.503, which suggesting that the stock is 49.665% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 0.892, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.82%.

Siebert Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MarketAxess Holdings offers a yield of 1.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Siebert Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings pays out 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Siebert Financial quarterly revenues are $28.9M, which are smaller than MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues of $208.6M. Siebert Financial's net income of $8.7M is lower than MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $15.1M. Notably, Siebert Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.87x while MarketAxess Holdings's PE ratio is 37.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Siebert Financial is 2.03x versus 10.04x for MarketAxess Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of 29.96% compared to Siebert Financial's net margin of -183.64%. Siebert Financial's return on equity of 21.91% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of -14.35%.

Siebert Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $15.40 which suggests that it could grow by 80.12%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than Siebert Financial, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than Siebert Financial.

Siebert Financial has a beta of 0.503, which suggesting that the stock is 49.665% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.747, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 374.659%.

Siebert Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Siebert Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Siebert Financial quarterly revenues are $28.9M, which are smaller than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $161.4M. Siebert Financial's net income of $8.7M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$296.4M. Notably, Siebert Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.87x while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 24.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Siebert Financial is 2.03x versus 5.71x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Soluna Holdings has a net margin of 29.96% compared to Siebert Financial's net margin of -127.29%. Siebert Financial's return on equity of 21.91% beat Soluna Holdings's return on equity of -160.3%.

Siebert Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Soluna Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Siebert Financial has higher upside potential than Soluna Holdings, analysts believe Siebert Financial is more attractive than Soluna Holdings.

Siebert Financial has a beta of 0.503, which suggesting that the stock is 49.665% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Soluna Holdings has a beta of 3.857, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 285.657%.

Siebert Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Soluna Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Siebert Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Soluna Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Siebert Financial quarterly revenues are $28.9M, which are larger than Soluna Holdings quarterly revenues of $5.9M. Siebert Financial's net income of $8.7M is higher than Soluna Holdings's net income of -$7.6M. Notably, Siebert Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.87x while Soluna Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Siebert Financial is 2.03x versus 0.20x for Soluna Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.