SIEB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BlackRock has a net margin of 29.96% compared to Siebert Financial's net margin of 28.62%. Siebert Financial's return on equity of 21.91% beat BlackRock's return on equity of 13.88%.

Siebert Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BlackRock has an analysts' consensus of $1,044.21 which suggests that it could grow by 5.6%. Given that BlackRock has higher upside potential than Siebert Financial, analysts believe BlackRock is more attractive than Siebert Financial.

Siebert Financial has a beta of 0.668, which suggesting that the stock is 33.243% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BlackRock has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.006%.

Siebert Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BlackRock offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.21 per share. Siebert Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BlackRock pays out 48.69% of its earnings as a dividend. BlackRock's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Siebert Financial quarterly revenues are $28.9M, which are smaller than BlackRock quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Siebert Financial's net income of $8.7M is lower than BlackRock's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Siebert Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.46x while BlackRock's PE ratio is 24.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Siebert Financial is 2.36x versus 7.23x for BlackRock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BitMine Immersion Technologies has a net margin of 29.96% compared to Siebert Financial's net margin of -76.24%. Siebert Financial's return on equity of 21.91% beat BitMine Immersion Technologies's return on equity of -88.47%.

Siebert Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BitMine Immersion Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Siebert Financial has higher upside potential than BitMine Immersion Technologies, analysts believe Siebert Financial is more attractive than BitMine Immersion Technologies.

Siebert Financial has a beta of 0.668, which suggesting that the stock is 33.243% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BitMine Immersion Technologies has a beta of 0.568, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.17%.

Siebert Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BitMine Immersion Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Siebert Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BitMine Immersion Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Siebert Financial quarterly revenues are $28.9M, which are larger than BitMine Immersion Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Siebert Financial's net income of $8.7M is higher than BitMine Immersion Technologies's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Siebert Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.46x while BitMine Immersion Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Siebert Financial is 2.36x versus 4.04x for BitMine Immersion Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MarketAxess Holdings has a net margin of 29.96% compared to Siebert Financial's net margin of 7.22%. Siebert Financial's return on equity of 21.91% beat MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 16%.

Siebert Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MarketAxess Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $236.50 which suggests that it could grow by 5.94%. Given that MarketAxess Holdings has higher upside potential than Siebert Financial, analysts believe MarketAxess Holdings is more attractive than Siebert Financial.

Siebert Financial has a beta of 0.668, which suggesting that the stock is 33.243% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 0.844, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.556%.

Siebert Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MarketAxess Holdings offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Siebert Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings pays out 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Siebert Financial quarterly revenues are $28.9M, which are smaller than MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues of $208.6M. Siebert Financial's net income of $8.7M is lower than MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $15.1M. Notably, Siebert Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.46x while MarketAxess Holdings's PE ratio is 38.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Siebert Financial is 2.36x versus 10.29x for MarketAxess Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of 29.96% compared to Siebert Financial's net margin of -183.64%. Siebert Financial's return on equity of 21.91% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of -14.35%.

Siebert Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $15.60 which suggests that it could grow by 54.15%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than Siebert Financial, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than Siebert Financial.

Siebert Financial has a beta of 0.668, which suggesting that the stock is 33.243% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 352.9%.

Siebert Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Siebert Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Siebert Financial quarterly revenues are $28.9M, which are smaller than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $161.4M. Siebert Financial's net income of $8.7M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$296.4M. Notably, Siebert Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.46x while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 24.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Siebert Financial is 2.36x versus 6.76x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.