RMBL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Genuine Parts has a net margin of -3.8% compared to RumbleON's net margin of 3.8%. RumbleON's return on equity of -173.32% beat Genuine Parts's return on equity of 24.39%.

RumbleON has a consensus price target of $6.75, signalling upside risk potential of 19.47%. On the other hand Genuine Parts has an analysts' consensus of $163.58 which suggests that it could grow by 12.46%. Given that RumbleON has higher upside potential than Genuine Parts, analysts believe RumbleON is more attractive than Genuine Parts.

RumbleON has a beta of 2.235, which suggesting that the stock is 123.472% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genuine Parts has a beta of 0.942, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.791%.

RumbleON has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genuine Parts offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. RumbleON pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genuine Parts pays out 40.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Genuine Parts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RumbleON quarterly revenues are $295M, which are smaller than Genuine Parts quarterly revenues of $6B. RumbleON's net income of -$11.2M is lower than Genuine Parts's net income of $226.6M. Notably, RumbleON's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Genuine Parts's PE ratio is 15.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RumbleON is 0.14x versus 0.70x for Genuine Parts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Group 1 Automotive has a net margin of -3.8% compared to RumbleON's net margin of 2.25%. RumbleON's return on equity of -173.32% beat Group 1 Automotive's return on equity of 18.42%.

RumbleON has a consensus price target of $6.75, signalling upside risk potential of 19.47%. On the other hand Group 1 Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $320.43 which suggests that it could grow by 4.21%. Given that RumbleON has higher upside potential than Group 1 Automotive, analysts believe RumbleON is more attractive than Group 1 Automotive.

RumbleON has a beta of 2.235, which suggesting that the stock is 123.472% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Group 1 Automotive has a beta of 1.352, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.217%.

RumbleON has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Group 1 Automotive offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. RumbleON pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive pays out 4.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RumbleON quarterly revenues are $295M, which are smaller than Group 1 Automotive quarterly revenues of $5.2B. RumbleON's net income of -$11.2M is lower than Group 1 Automotive's net income of $117.3M. Notably, RumbleON's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Group 1 Automotive's PE ratio is 11.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RumbleON is 0.14x versus 0.30x for Group 1 Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingsway Financial Services has a net margin of -3.8% compared to RumbleON's net margin of -9.83%. RumbleON's return on equity of -173.32% beat Kingsway Financial Services's return on equity of -42.93%.

RumbleON has a consensus price target of $6.75, signalling upside risk potential of 19.47%. On the other hand Kingsway Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -52.72%. Given that RumbleON has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, analysts believe RumbleON is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services.

RumbleON has a beta of 2.235, which suggesting that the stock is 123.472% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of -0.082, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.195%.

RumbleON has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingsway Financial Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RumbleON pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsway Financial Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RumbleON quarterly revenues are $295M, which are larger than Kingsway Financial Services quarterly revenues of $28.5M. RumbleON's net income of -$11.2M is lower than Kingsway Financial Services's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, RumbleON's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kingsway Financial Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RumbleON is 0.14x versus 2.13x for Kingsway Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LKQ has a net margin of -3.8% compared to RumbleON's net margin of 5.33%. RumbleON's return on equity of -173.32% beat LKQ's return on equity of 11.56%.

RumbleON has a consensus price target of $6.75, signalling upside risk potential of 19.47%. On the other hand LKQ has an analysts' consensus of $52.14 which suggests that it could grow by 42.08%. Given that LKQ has higher upside potential than RumbleON, analysts believe LKQ is more attractive than RumbleON.

RumbleON has a beta of 2.235, which suggesting that the stock is 123.472% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LKQ has a beta of 1.290, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.026%.

RumbleON has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LKQ offers a yield of 3.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. RumbleON pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LKQ pays out 32.27% of its earnings as a dividend. LKQ's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RumbleON quarterly revenues are $295M, which are smaller than LKQ quarterly revenues of $3.6B. RumbleON's net income of -$11.2M is lower than LKQ's net income of $191M. Notably, RumbleON's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LKQ's PE ratio is 13.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RumbleON is 0.14x versus 0.67x for LKQ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.