QUBT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NVIDIA has a net margin of -82640.32% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 42.61%. Quantum Computing's return on equity of -41.65% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.

Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.42%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $173.92 which suggests that it could grow by 12.71%. Given that Quantum Computing has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Quantum Computing is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.854, which suggesting that the stock is 285.365% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.079%.

Quantum Computing has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Quantum Computing pays -0.31% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quantum Computing quarterly revenues are $39K, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. Quantum Computing's net income of $17M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, Quantum Computing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 49.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum Computing is 4,869.16x versus 25.70x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rigetti Computing has a net margin of -82640.32% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of -6726.52%. Quantum Computing's return on equity of -41.65% beat Rigetti Computing's return on equity of -99.09%.

Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.42%. On the other hand Rigetti Computing has an analysts' consensus of $14.80 which suggests that it could grow by 33.45%. Given that Rigetti Computing has higher upside potential than Quantum Computing, analysts believe Rigetti Computing is more attractive than Quantum Computing.

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.854, which suggesting that the stock is 285.365% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rigetti Computing has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Quantum Computing has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rigetti Computing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quantum Computing pays -0.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Rigetti Computing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quantum Computing quarterly revenues are $39K, which are smaller than Rigetti Computing quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Quantum Computing's net income of $17M is lower than Rigetti Computing's net income of $42.6M. Notably, Quantum Computing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rigetti Computing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum Computing is 4,869.16x versus 267.48x for Rigetti Computing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Semtech has a net margin of -82640.32% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 7.71%. Quantum Computing's return on equity of -41.65% beat Semtech's return on equity of -115.46%.

Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.42%. On the other hand Semtech has an analysts' consensus of $55.50 which suggests that it could grow by 24.75%. Given that Quantum Computing has higher upside potential than Semtech, analysts believe Quantum Computing is more attractive than Semtech.

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.854, which suggesting that the stock is 285.365% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Semtech has a beta of 1.885, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.493%.

Quantum Computing has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Semtech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quantum Computing pays -0.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Semtech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quantum Computing quarterly revenues are $39K, which are smaller than Semtech quarterly revenues of $251.1M. Quantum Computing's net income of $17M is lower than Semtech's net income of $19.3M. Notably, Quantum Computing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Semtech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum Computing is 4,869.16x versus 3.63x for Semtech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AgEagle Aerial Systems has a net margin of -82640.32% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of -105.32%. Quantum Computing's return on equity of -41.65% beat AgEagle Aerial Systems's return on equity of -497.03%.

Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.42%. On the other hand AgEagle Aerial Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1574.11%. Given that AgEagle Aerial Systems has higher upside potential than Quantum Computing, analysts believe AgEagle Aerial Systems is more attractive than Quantum Computing.

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.854, which suggesting that the stock is 285.365% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AgEagle Aerial Systems has a beta of 3.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 220.555%.

Quantum Computing has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AgEagle Aerial Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quantum Computing pays -0.31% of its earnings as a dividend. AgEagle Aerial Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quantum Computing quarterly revenues are $39K, which are smaller than AgEagle Aerial Systems quarterly revenues of $3.6M. Quantum Computing's net income of $17M is higher than AgEagle Aerial Systems's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Quantum Computing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AgEagle Aerial Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum Computing is 4,869.16x versus 0.23x for AgEagle Aerial Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.