IONQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Pure Storage has a net margin of -426.28% compared to IonQ's net margin of -1.8%. IonQ's return on equity of -64.15% beat Pure Storage's return on equity of 9.41%.

IonQ has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling downside risk potential of -7.41%. On the other hand Pure Storage has an analysts' consensus of $69.41 which suggests that it could grow by 29.39%. Given that Pure Storage has higher upside potential than IonQ, analysts believe Pure Storage is more attractive than IonQ.

IonQ has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pure Storage has a beta of 1.055, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.529%.

IonQ has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pure Storage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IonQ pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pure Storage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

IonQ quarterly revenues are $7.6M, which are smaller than Pure Storage quarterly revenues of $778.5M. IonQ's net income of -$32.3M is lower than Pure Storage's net income of -$14M. Notably, IonQ's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pure Storage's PE ratio is 144.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IonQ is 218.90x versus 5.59x for Pure Storage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quantum has a net margin of -426.28% compared to IonQ's net margin of -19.2%. IonQ's return on equity of -64.15% beat Quantum's return on equity of --.

IonQ has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling downside risk potential of -7.41%. On the other hand Quantum has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 52%. Given that Quantum has higher upside potential than IonQ, analysts believe Quantum is more attractive than IonQ.

IonQ has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quantum has a beta of 2.715, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 171.536%.

IonQ has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quantum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IonQ pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quantum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

IonQ quarterly revenues are $7.6M, which are smaller than Quantum quarterly revenues of $70.5M. IonQ's net income of -$32.3M is lower than Quantum's net income of -$13.5M. Notably, IonQ's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quantum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IonQ is 218.90x versus 0.21x for Quantum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quantum Computing has a net margin of -426.28% compared to IonQ's net margin of -82640.32%. IonQ's return on equity of -64.15% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity of -41.65%.

IonQ has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling downside risk potential of -7.41%. On the other hand Quantum Computing has an analysts' consensus of $8.50 which suggests that it could fall by -31.62%. Given that Quantum Computing has more downside risk than IonQ, analysts believe IonQ is more attractive than Quantum Computing.

IonQ has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.744, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 274.351%.

IonQ has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quantum Computing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IonQ pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quantum Computing pays out -0.31% of its earnings as a dividend.

IonQ quarterly revenues are $7.6M, which are larger than Quantum Computing quarterly revenues of $39K. IonQ's net income of -$32.3M is lower than Quantum Computing's net income of $17M. Notably, IonQ's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quantum Computing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IonQ is 218.90x versus 3,615.51x for Quantum Computing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rigetti Computing has a net margin of -426.28% compared to IonQ's net margin of -6726.52%. IonQ's return on equity of -64.15% beat Rigetti Computing's return on equity of -99.09%.

IonQ has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling downside risk potential of -7.41%. On the other hand Rigetti Computing has an analysts' consensus of $14.80 which suggests that it could grow by 12.55%. Given that Rigetti Computing has higher upside potential than IonQ, analysts believe Rigetti Computing is more attractive than IonQ.

IonQ has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rigetti Computing has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

IonQ has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rigetti Computing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IonQ pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rigetti Computing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

IonQ quarterly revenues are $7.6M, which are larger than Rigetti Computing quarterly revenues of $1.5M. IonQ's net income of -$32.3M is lower than Rigetti Computing's net income of $42.6M. Notably, IonQ's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rigetti Computing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IonQ is 218.90x versus 317.17x for Rigetti Computing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.