PRGS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aurora Innovation has a net margin of 4.6% compared to Progress Software's net margin of --. Progress Software's return on equity of 13.14% beat Aurora Innovation's return on equity of --.

Progress Software has a consensus price target of $71.71, signalling upside risk potential of 12.48%. On the other hand Aurora Innovation has an analysts' consensus of $10.51 which suggests that it could grow by 103.29%. Given that Aurora Innovation has higher upside potential than Progress Software, analysts believe Aurora Innovation is more attractive than Progress Software.

Progress Software has a beta of 0.673, which suggesting that the stock is 32.745% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aurora Innovation has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Progress Software has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Aurora Innovation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Progress Software pays 45.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Aurora Innovation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Progress Software's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Progress Software quarterly revenues are $238M, which are larger than Aurora Innovation quarterly revenues of --. Progress Software's net income of $10.9M is higher than Aurora Innovation's net income of -$208M. Notably, Progress Software's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.43x while Aurora Innovation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progress Software is 3.51x versus 126.99x for Aurora Innovation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AvePoint has a net margin of 4.6% compared to Progress Software's net margin of 3.7%. Progress Software's return on equity of 13.14% beat AvePoint's return on equity of -9.44%.

Progress Software has a consensus price target of $71.71, signalling upside risk potential of 12.48%. On the other hand AvePoint has an analysts' consensus of $20.71 which suggests that it could grow by 7.78%. Given that Progress Software has higher upside potential than AvePoint, analysts believe Progress Software is more attractive than AvePoint.

Progress Software has a beta of 0.673, which suggesting that the stock is 32.745% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AvePoint has a beta of 1.344, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.437%.

Progress Software has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. AvePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Progress Software pays 45.97% of its earnings as a dividend. AvePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Progress Software's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Progress Software quarterly revenues are $238M, which are larger than AvePoint quarterly revenues of $93.1M. Progress Software's net income of $10.9M is higher than AvePoint's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Progress Software's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.43x while AvePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progress Software is 3.51x versus 10.98x for AvePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cantaloupe has a net margin of 4.6% compared to Progress Software's net margin of 65.17%. Progress Software's return on equity of 13.14% beat Cantaloupe's return on equity of 30.22%.

Progress Software has a consensus price target of $71.71, signalling upside risk potential of 12.48%. On the other hand Cantaloupe has an analysts' consensus of $11.88 which suggests that it could grow by 7.96%. Given that Progress Software has higher upside potential than Cantaloupe, analysts believe Progress Software is more attractive than Cantaloupe.

Progress Software has a beta of 0.673, which suggesting that the stock is 32.745% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cantaloupe has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.28%.

Progress Software has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Cantaloupe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Progress Software pays 45.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Cantaloupe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Progress Software's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Progress Software quarterly revenues are $238M, which are larger than Cantaloupe quarterly revenues of $75.4M. Progress Software's net income of $10.9M is lower than Cantaloupe's net income of $49.2M. Notably, Progress Software's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.43x while Cantaloupe's PE ratio is 13.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progress Software is 3.51x versus 2.80x for Cantaloupe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verra Mobility has a net margin of 4.6% compared to Progress Software's net margin of 14.49%. Progress Software's return on equity of 13.14% beat Verra Mobility's return on equity of 8.93%.

Progress Software has a consensus price target of $71.71, signalling upside risk potential of 12.48%. On the other hand Verra Mobility has an analysts' consensus of $28.92 which suggests that it could grow by 13.85%. Given that Verra Mobility has higher upside potential than Progress Software, analysts believe Verra Mobility is more attractive than Progress Software.

Progress Software has a beta of 0.673, which suggesting that the stock is 32.745% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.762, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.812%.

Progress Software has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Verra Mobility offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Progress Software pays 45.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Verra Mobility pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Progress Software's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Progress Software quarterly revenues are $238M, which are larger than Verra Mobility quarterly revenues of $223.3M. Progress Software's net income of $10.9M is lower than Verra Mobility's net income of $32.3M. Notably, Progress Software's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.43x while Verra Mobility's PE ratio is 127.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progress Software is 3.51x versus 4.72x for Verra Mobility. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.