AVPT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aurora Innovation has a net margin of 3.7% compared to AvePoint's net margin of --. AvePoint's return on equity of -9.44% beat Aurora Innovation's return on equity of --.

AvePoint has a consensus price target of $20.29, signalling upside risk potential of 6.49%. On the other hand Aurora Innovation has an analysts' consensus of $10.51 which suggests that it could grow by 89.37%. Given that Aurora Innovation has higher upside potential than AvePoint, analysts believe Aurora Innovation is more attractive than AvePoint.

AvePoint has a beta of 1.344, which suggesting that the stock is 34.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aurora Innovation has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AvePoint has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aurora Innovation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AvePoint pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aurora Innovation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AvePoint quarterly revenues are $93.1M, which are larger than Aurora Innovation quarterly revenues of --. AvePoint's net income of $3.4M is higher than Aurora Innovation's net income of -$208M. Notably, AvePoint's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Aurora Innovation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AvePoint is 10.89x versus 136.32x for Aurora Innovation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cantaloupe has a net margin of 3.7% compared to AvePoint's net margin of 65.17%. AvePoint's return on equity of -9.44% beat Cantaloupe's return on equity of 30.22%.

AvePoint has a consensus price target of $20.29, signalling upside risk potential of 6.49%. On the other hand Cantaloupe has an analysts' consensus of $11.88 which suggests that it could grow by 8.05%. Given that Cantaloupe has higher upside potential than AvePoint, analysts believe Cantaloupe is more attractive than AvePoint.

AvePoint has a beta of 1.344, which suggesting that the stock is 34.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cantaloupe has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.28%.

AvePoint has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cantaloupe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AvePoint pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cantaloupe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AvePoint quarterly revenues are $93.1M, which are larger than Cantaloupe quarterly revenues of $75.4M. AvePoint's net income of $3.4M is lower than Cantaloupe's net income of $49.2M. Notably, AvePoint's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cantaloupe's PE ratio is 13.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AvePoint is 10.89x versus 2.80x for Cantaloupe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progress Software has a net margin of 3.7% compared to AvePoint's net margin of 4.6%. AvePoint's return on equity of -9.44% beat Progress Software's return on equity of 13.14%.

AvePoint has a consensus price target of $20.29, signalling upside risk potential of 6.49%. On the other hand Progress Software has an analysts' consensus of $71.71 which suggests that it could grow by 13.42%. Given that Progress Software has higher upside potential than AvePoint, analysts believe Progress Software is more attractive than AvePoint.

AvePoint has a beta of 1.344, which suggesting that the stock is 34.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progress Software has a beta of 0.673, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.745%.

AvePoint has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Progress Software offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. AvePoint pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Progress Software pays out 45.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Progress Software's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AvePoint quarterly revenues are $93.1M, which are smaller than Progress Software quarterly revenues of $238M. AvePoint's net income of $3.4M is lower than Progress Software's net income of $10.9M. Notably, AvePoint's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Progress Software's PE ratio is 49.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AvePoint is 10.89x versus 3.48x for Progress Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verra Mobility has a net margin of 3.7% compared to AvePoint's net margin of 14.49%. AvePoint's return on equity of -9.44% beat Verra Mobility's return on equity of 8.93%.

AvePoint has a consensus price target of $20.29, signalling upside risk potential of 6.49%. On the other hand Verra Mobility has an analysts' consensus of $28.92 which suggests that it could grow by 19.64%. Given that Verra Mobility has higher upside potential than AvePoint, analysts believe Verra Mobility is more attractive than AvePoint.

AvePoint has a beta of 1.344, which suggesting that the stock is 34.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.762, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.812%.

AvePoint has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Verra Mobility offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AvePoint pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verra Mobility pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AvePoint quarterly revenues are $93.1M, which are smaller than Verra Mobility quarterly revenues of $223.3M. AvePoint's net income of $3.4M is lower than Verra Mobility's net income of $32.3M. Notably, AvePoint's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Verra Mobility's PE ratio is 120.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AvePoint is 10.89x versus 4.50x for Verra Mobility. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.