CTLP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AtlasClear Holdings has a net margin of 65.17% compared to Cantaloupe's net margin of -114.15%. Cantaloupe's return on equity of 30.22% beat AtlasClear Holdings's return on equity of --.

Cantaloupe has a consensus price target of $11.88, signalling upside risk potential of 8.05%. On the other hand AtlasClear Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 461438.37%. Given that AtlasClear Holdings has higher upside potential than Cantaloupe, analysts believe AtlasClear Holdings is more attractive than Cantaloupe.

Cantaloupe has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.28% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AtlasClear Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cantaloupe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AtlasClear Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cantaloupe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AtlasClear Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cantaloupe quarterly revenues are $75.4M, which are larger than AtlasClear Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Cantaloupe's net income of $49.2M is higher than AtlasClear Holdings's net income of -$2.9M. Notably, Cantaloupe's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.91x while AtlasClear Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cantaloupe is 2.80x versus 0.01x for AtlasClear Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Aurora Innovation has a net margin of 65.17% compared to Cantaloupe's net margin of --. Cantaloupe's return on equity of 30.22% beat Aurora Innovation's return on equity of --.

Cantaloupe has a consensus price target of $11.88, signalling upside risk potential of 8.05%. On the other hand Aurora Innovation has an analysts' consensus of $10.51 which suggests that it could grow by 94.63%. Given that Aurora Innovation has higher upside potential than Cantaloupe, analysts believe Aurora Innovation is more attractive than Cantaloupe.

Cantaloupe has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.28% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aurora Innovation has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cantaloupe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aurora Innovation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cantaloupe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aurora Innovation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cantaloupe quarterly revenues are $75.4M, which are larger than Aurora Innovation quarterly revenues of --. Cantaloupe's net income of $49.2M is higher than Aurora Innovation's net income of -$208M. Notably, Cantaloupe's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.91x while Aurora Innovation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cantaloupe is 2.80x versus 132.64x for Aurora Innovation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Veea has a net margin of 65.17% compared to Cantaloupe's net margin of -65748.98%. Cantaloupe's return on equity of 30.22% beat Veea's return on equity of --.

Cantaloupe has a consensus price target of $11.88, signalling upside risk potential of 8.05%. On the other hand Veea has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cantaloupe has higher upside potential than Veea, analysts believe Cantaloupe is more attractive than Veea.

Cantaloupe has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.28% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Veea has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cantaloupe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Veea offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cantaloupe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Veea pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cantaloupe quarterly revenues are $75.4M, which are larger than Veea quarterly revenues of $14.3K. Cantaloupe's net income of $49.2M is higher than Veea's net income of $4.3M. Notably, Cantaloupe's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.91x while Veea's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cantaloupe is 2.80x versus 455.21x for Veea. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verra Mobility has a net margin of 65.17% compared to Cantaloupe's net margin of 14.49%. Cantaloupe's return on equity of 30.22% beat Verra Mobility's return on equity of 8.93%.

Cantaloupe has a consensus price target of $11.88, signalling upside risk potential of 8.05%. On the other hand Verra Mobility has an analysts' consensus of $28.92 which suggests that it could grow by 14.25%. Given that Verra Mobility has higher upside potential than Cantaloupe, analysts believe Verra Mobility is more attractive than Cantaloupe.

Cantaloupe has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.28% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.762, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.812%.

Cantaloupe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Verra Mobility offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cantaloupe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verra Mobility pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cantaloupe quarterly revenues are $75.4M, which are smaller than Verra Mobility quarterly revenues of $223.3M. Cantaloupe's net income of $49.2M is higher than Verra Mobility's net income of $32.3M. Notably, Cantaloupe's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.91x while Verra Mobility's PE ratio is 126.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cantaloupe is 2.80x versus 4.71x for Verra Mobility. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.