VRRM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AtlasClear Holdings has a net margin of 14.49% compared to Verra Mobility's net margin of -114.15%. Verra Mobility's return on equity of 8.93% beat AtlasClear Holdings's return on equity of --.

Verra Mobility has a consensus price target of $28.92, signalling upside risk potential of 13.85%. On the other hand AtlasClear Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 441076.38%. Given that AtlasClear Holdings has higher upside potential than Verra Mobility, analysts believe AtlasClear Holdings is more attractive than Verra Mobility.

Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.774, which suggesting that the stock is 22.644% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AtlasClear Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Verra Mobility has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AtlasClear Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Verra Mobility pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AtlasClear Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Verra Mobility quarterly revenues are $223.3M, which are larger than AtlasClear Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Verra Mobility's net income of $32.3M is higher than AtlasClear Holdings's net income of -$2.9M. Notably, Verra Mobility's price-to-earnings ratio is 127.00x while AtlasClear Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verra Mobility is 4.72x versus 0.02x for AtlasClear Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Aurora Innovation has a net margin of 14.49% compared to Verra Mobility's net margin of --. Verra Mobility's return on equity of 8.93% beat Aurora Innovation's return on equity of --.

Verra Mobility has a consensus price target of $28.92, signalling upside risk potential of 13.85%. On the other hand Aurora Innovation has an analysts' consensus of $10.51 which suggests that it could grow by 100.96%. Given that Aurora Innovation has higher upside potential than Verra Mobility, analysts believe Aurora Innovation is more attractive than Verra Mobility.

Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.774, which suggesting that the stock is 22.644% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aurora Innovation has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Verra Mobility has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aurora Innovation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Verra Mobility pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aurora Innovation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Verra Mobility quarterly revenues are $223.3M, which are larger than Aurora Innovation quarterly revenues of --. Verra Mobility's net income of $32.3M is higher than Aurora Innovation's net income of -$208M. Notably, Verra Mobility's price-to-earnings ratio is 127.00x while Aurora Innovation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verra Mobility is 4.72x versus 128.46x for Aurora Innovation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lyft has a net margin of 14.49% compared to Verra Mobility's net margin of 0.18%. Verra Mobility's return on equity of 8.93% beat Lyft's return on equity of 8.54%.

Verra Mobility has a consensus price target of $28.92, signalling upside risk potential of 13.85%. On the other hand Lyft has an analysts' consensus of $17.27 which suggests that it could grow by 15.85%. Given that Lyft has higher upside potential than Verra Mobility, analysts believe Lyft is more attractive than Verra Mobility.

Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.774, which suggesting that the stock is 22.644% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lyft has a beta of 2.202, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.226%.

Verra Mobility has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lyft offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Verra Mobility pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lyft pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Verra Mobility quarterly revenues are $223.3M, which are smaller than Lyft quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Verra Mobility's net income of $32.3M is higher than Lyft's net income of $2.6M. Notably, Verra Mobility's price-to-earnings ratio is 127.00x while Lyft's PE ratio is 99.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verra Mobility is 4.72x versus 1.05x for Lyft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Veea has a net margin of 14.49% compared to Verra Mobility's net margin of -65748.98%. Verra Mobility's return on equity of 8.93% beat Veea's return on equity of --.

Verra Mobility has a consensus price target of $28.92, signalling upside risk potential of 13.85%. On the other hand Veea has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Verra Mobility has higher upside potential than Veea, analysts believe Verra Mobility is more attractive than Veea.

Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.774, which suggesting that the stock is 22.644% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Veea has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Verra Mobility has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Veea offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Verra Mobility pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Veea pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Verra Mobility quarterly revenues are $223.3M, which are larger than Veea quarterly revenues of $14.3K. Verra Mobility's net income of $32.3M is higher than Veea's net income of $4.3M. Notably, Verra Mobility's price-to-earnings ratio is 127.00x while Veea's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verra Mobility is 4.72x versus 410.63x for Veea. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.