OCC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BK Technologies has a net margin of -3.98% compared to Optical Cable's net margin of 11.19%. Optical Cable's return on equity of -14.67% beat BK Technologies's return on equity of 36.85%.

Optical Cable has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BK Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 29.63%. Given that BK Technologies has higher upside potential than Optical Cable, analysts believe BK Technologies is more attractive than Optical Cable.

Optical Cable has a beta of 0.274, which suggesting that the stock is 72.564% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BK Technologies has a beta of 0.313, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.701%.

Optical Cable has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BK Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Optical Cable pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BK Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Optical Cable quarterly revenues are $17.5M, which are smaller than BK Technologies quarterly revenues of $19.1M. Optical Cable's net income of -$697.9K is lower than BK Technologies's net income of $2.1M. Notably, Optical Cable's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BK Technologies's PE ratio is 16.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Optical Cable is 0.30x versus 2.08x for BK Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Isomet has a net margin of -3.98% compared to Optical Cable's net margin of --. Optical Cable's return on equity of -14.67% beat Isomet's return on equity of --.

Optical Cable has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Isomet has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Optical Cable has higher upside potential than Isomet, analysts believe Optical Cable is more attractive than Isomet.

Optical Cable has a beta of 0.274, which suggesting that the stock is 72.564% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Isomet has a beta of 0.990, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.989%.

Optical Cable has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Isomet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Optical Cable pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Isomet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Optical Cable quarterly revenues are $17.5M, which are larger than Isomet quarterly revenues of --. Optical Cable's net income of -$697.9K is higher than Isomet's net income of --. Notably, Optical Cable's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Isomet's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Optical Cable is 0.30x versus -- for Isomet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KULR Technology Group has a net margin of -3.98% compared to Optical Cable's net margin of -768.06%. Optical Cable's return on equity of -14.67% beat KULR Technology Group's return on equity of -98.68%.

Optical Cable has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KULR Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of $4.17 which suggests that it could grow by 233.33%. Given that KULR Technology Group has higher upside potential than Optical Cable, analysts believe KULR Technology Group is more attractive than Optical Cable.

Optical Cable has a beta of 0.274, which suggesting that the stock is 72.564% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KULR Technology Group has a beta of 1.640, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.027%.

Optical Cable has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KULR Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Optical Cable pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KULR Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Optical Cable quarterly revenues are $17.5M, which are larger than KULR Technology Group quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Optical Cable's net income of -$697.9K is higher than KULR Technology Group's net income of -$18.8M. Notably, Optical Cable's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KULR Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Optical Cable is 0.30x versus 24.09x for KULR Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Novanta has a net margin of -3.98% compared to Optical Cable's net margin of 9.09%. Optical Cable's return on equity of -14.67% beat Novanta's return on equity of 9.7%.

Optical Cable has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Novanta has an analysts' consensus of $147.32 which suggests that it could grow by 15.31%. Given that Novanta has higher upside potential than Optical Cable, analysts believe Novanta is more attractive than Optical Cable.

Optical Cable has a beta of 0.274, which suggesting that the stock is 72.564% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Novanta has a beta of 1.459, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.908%.

Optical Cable has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Novanta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Optical Cable pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Novanta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Optical Cable quarterly revenues are $17.5M, which are smaller than Novanta quarterly revenues of $233.4M. Optical Cable's net income of -$697.9K is lower than Novanta's net income of $21.2M. Notably, Optical Cable's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Novanta's PE ratio is 65.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Optical Cable is 0.30x versus 4.85x for Novanta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.