BKTI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Harmonic has a net margin of 11.68% compared to BK Technologies's net margin of 11.09%. BK Technologies's return on equity of 22.52% beat Harmonic's return on equity of 21.14%.

BK Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -46.03%. On the other hand Harmonic has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.08%. Given that Harmonic has higher upside potential than BK Technologies, analysts believe Harmonic is more attractive than BK Technologies.

BK Technologies has a beta of 1.239, which suggesting that the stock is 23.912% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harmonic has a beta of 0.917, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.333%.

BK Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harmonic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BK Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harmonic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BK Technologies quarterly revenues are $20.2M, which are smaller than Harmonic quarterly revenues of $195.8M. BK Technologies's net income of $2.4M is lower than Harmonic's net income of $21.7M. Notably, BK Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.86x while Harmonic's PE ratio is 18.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BK Technologies is 1.78x versus 2.48x for Harmonic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inseego has a net margin of 11.68% compared to BK Technologies's net margin of 16.6%. BK Technologies's return on equity of 22.52% beat Inseego's return on equity of --.

BK Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -46.03%. On the other hand Inseego has an analysts' consensus of $14.33 which suggests that it could grow by 38.22%. Given that Inseego has higher upside potential than BK Technologies, analysts believe Inseego is more attractive than BK Technologies.

BK Technologies has a beta of 1.239, which suggesting that the stock is 23.912% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inseego has a beta of 1.481, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.117%.

BK Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inseego offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BK Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inseego pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BK Technologies quarterly revenues are $20.2M, which are smaller than Inseego quarterly revenues of $54M. BK Technologies's net income of $2.4M is lower than Inseego's net income of $9M. Notably, BK Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.86x while Inseego's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BK Technologies is 1.78x versus 0.57x for Inseego. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KVH Industries has a net margin of 11.68% compared to BK Technologies's net margin of -4.14%. BK Technologies's return on equity of 22.52% beat KVH Industries's return on equity of -12.87%.

BK Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -46.03%. On the other hand KVH Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.83%. Given that KVH Industries has higher upside potential than BK Technologies, analysts believe KVH Industries is more attractive than BK Technologies.

BK Technologies has a beta of 1.239, which suggesting that the stock is 23.912% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KVH Industries has a beta of 0.636, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.429%.

BK Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KVH Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BK Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KVH Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BK Technologies quarterly revenues are $20.2M, which are smaller than KVH Industries quarterly revenues of $29M. BK Technologies's net income of $2.4M is higher than KVH Industries's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, BK Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.86x while KVH Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BK Technologies is 1.78x versus 0.87x for KVH Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Viavi Solutions has a net margin of 11.68% compared to BK Technologies's net margin of -0.76%. BK Technologies's return on equity of 22.52% beat Viavi Solutions's return on equity of -5.36%.

BK Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -46.03%. On the other hand Viavi Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $10.85 which suggests that it could grow by 5.03%. Given that Viavi Solutions has higher upside potential than BK Technologies, analysts believe Viavi Solutions is more attractive than BK Technologies.

BK Technologies has a beta of 1.239, which suggesting that the stock is 23.912% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Viavi Solutions has a beta of 0.919, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.144%.

BK Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Viavi Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BK Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viavi Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BK Technologies quarterly revenues are $20.2M, which are smaller than Viavi Solutions quarterly revenues of $238.2M. BK Technologies's net income of $2.4M is higher than Viavi Solutions's net income of -$1.8M. Notably, BK Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.86x while Viavi Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BK Technologies is 1.78x versus 2.32x for Viavi Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.