NEHC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mach Natural Resources LP has a net margin of -1017.06% compared to New Era Helium's net margin of 7.01%. New Era Helium's return on equity of -- beat Mach Natural Resources LP's return on equity of 28.43%.

New Era Helium has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mach Natural Resources LP has an analysts' consensus of $22.00 which suggests that it could grow by 53.42%. Given that Mach Natural Resources LP has higher upside potential than New Era Helium, analysts believe Mach Natural Resources LP is more attractive than New Era Helium.

New Era Helium has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mach Natural Resources LP has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

New Era Helium has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mach Natural Resources LP offers a yield of 19.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. New Era Helium pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mach Natural Resources LP pays out 83.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Mach Natural Resources LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

New Era Helium quarterly revenues are $326.5K, which are smaller than Mach Natural Resources LP quarterly revenues of $226.8M. New Era Helium's net income of -$3.3M is lower than Mach Natural Resources LP's net income of $15.9M. Notably, New Era Helium's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mach Natural Resources LP's PE ratio is 8.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Era Helium is 5.62x versus 1.53x for Mach Natural Resources LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prairie Operating has a net margin of -1017.06% compared to New Era Helium's net margin of -19.26%. New Era Helium's return on equity of -- beat Prairie Operating's return on equity of -42.11%.

New Era Helium has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Prairie Operating has an analysts' consensus of $8.75 which suggests that it could grow by 167.58%. Given that Prairie Operating has higher upside potential than New Era Helium, analysts believe Prairie Operating is more attractive than New Era Helium.

New Era Helium has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prairie Operating has a beta of 2.020, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.024%.

New Era Helium has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Prairie Operating offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. New Era Helium pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Prairie Operating pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

New Era Helium quarterly revenues are $326.5K, which are smaller than Prairie Operating quarterly revenues of $13.6M. New Era Helium's net income of -$3.3M is lower than Prairie Operating's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, New Era Helium's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Prairie Operating's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Era Helium is 5.62x versus -- for Prairie Operating. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ring Energy has a net margin of -1017.06% compared to New Era Helium's net margin of 11.52%. New Era Helium's return on equity of -- beat Ring Energy's return on equity of 8.47%.

New Era Helium has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ring Energy has an analysts' consensus of $3.47 which suggests that it could grow by 350.65%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than New Era Helium, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than New Era Helium.

New Era Helium has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ring Energy has a beta of 0.755, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.529%.

New Era Helium has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ring Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. New Era Helium pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ring Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

New Era Helium quarterly revenues are $326.5K, which are smaller than Ring Energy quarterly revenues of $79.1M. New Era Helium's net income of -$3.3M is lower than Ring Energy's net income of $9.1M. Notably, New Era Helium's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ring Energy's PE ratio is 2.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Era Helium is 5.62x versus 0.44x for Ring Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SM Energy has a net margin of -1017.06% compared to New Era Helium's net margin of 21.71%. New Era Helium's return on equity of -- beat SM Energy's return on equity of 20.29%.

New Era Helium has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SM Energy has an analysts' consensus of $39.69 which suggests that it could grow by 60.83%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than New Era Helium, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than New Era Helium.

New Era Helium has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Energy has a beta of 2.190, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.967%.

New Era Helium has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SM Energy offers a yield of 3.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. New Era Helium pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy pays out 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

New Era Helium quarterly revenues are $326.5K, which are smaller than SM Energy quarterly revenues of $839.6M. New Era Helium's net income of -$3.3M is lower than SM Energy's net income of $182.3M. Notably, New Era Helium's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SM Energy's PE ratio is 3.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Era Helium is 5.62x versus 0.96x for SM Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.