SM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EOG Resources has a net margin of 21.71% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 25.04%. SM Energy's return on equity of 20.29% beat EOG Resources's return on equity of 20.78%.

SM Energy has a consensus price target of $38.86, signalling upside risk potential of 40.99%. On the other hand EOG Resources has an analysts' consensus of $140.95 which suggests that it could grow by 12.74%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than EOG Resources, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than EOG Resources.

SM Energy has a beta of 2.190, which suggesting that the stock is 118.967% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EOG Resources has a beta of 0.746, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.354%.

SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.83%. EOG Resources offers a yield of 3.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. SM Energy pays 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. EOG Resources pays out 32.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SM Energy quarterly revenues are $839.6M, which are smaller than EOG Resources quarterly revenues of $5.8B. SM Energy's net income of $182.3M is lower than EOG Resources's net income of $1.5B. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.86x while EOG Resources's PE ratio is 11.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 1.08x versus 3.01x for EOG Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ring Energy has a net margin of 21.71% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 11.52%. SM Energy's return on equity of 20.29% beat Ring Energy's return on equity of 8.47%.

SM Energy has a consensus price target of $38.86, signalling upside risk potential of 40.99%. On the other hand Ring Energy has an analysts' consensus of $3.47 which suggests that it could grow by 333.48%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than SM Energy, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than SM Energy.

SM Energy has a beta of 2.190, which suggesting that the stock is 118.967% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ring Energy has a beta of 0.755, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.529%.

SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.83%. Ring Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SM Energy pays 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Ring Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SM Energy quarterly revenues are $839.6M, which are larger than Ring Energy quarterly revenues of $79.1M. SM Energy's net income of $182.3M is higher than Ring Energy's net income of $9.1M. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.86x while Ring Energy's PE ratio is 2.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 1.08x versus 0.46x for Ring Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SandRidge Energy has a net margin of 21.71% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 30.63%. SM Energy's return on equity of 20.29% beat SandRidge Energy's return on equity of 14.64%.

SM Energy has a consensus price target of $38.86, signalling upside risk potential of 40.99%. On the other hand SandRidge Energy has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 42.74%. Given that SandRidge Energy has higher upside potential than SM Energy, analysts believe SandRidge Energy is more attractive than SM Energy.

SM Energy has a beta of 2.190, which suggesting that the stock is 118.967% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SandRidge Energy has a beta of 0.914, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.59%.

SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.83%. SandRidge Energy offers a yield of 3.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. SM Energy pays 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. SandRidge Energy pays out 114.85% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SandRidge Energy's is not.

SM Energy quarterly revenues are $839.6M, which are larger than SandRidge Energy quarterly revenues of $42.6M. SM Energy's net income of $182.3M is higher than SandRidge Energy's net income of $13M. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.86x while SandRidge Energy's PE ratio is 6.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 1.08x versus 3.22x for SandRidge Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vitesse Energy has a net margin of 21.71% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 4.03%. SM Energy's return on equity of 20.29% beat Vitesse Energy's return on equity of 4.75%.

SM Energy has a consensus price target of $38.86, signalling upside risk potential of 40.99%. On the other hand Vitesse Energy has an analysts' consensus of $25.60 which suggests that it could grow by 10.3%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Vitesse Energy, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Vitesse Energy.

SM Energy has a beta of 2.190, which suggesting that the stock is 118.967% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vitesse Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.83%. Vitesse Energy offers a yield of 9.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. SM Energy pays 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Vitesse Energy pays out 301.8% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Vitesse Energy's is not.

SM Energy quarterly revenues are $839.6M, which are larger than Vitesse Energy quarterly revenues of $66.2M. SM Energy's net income of $182.3M is higher than Vitesse Energy's net income of $2.7M. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.86x while Vitesse Energy's PE ratio is 30.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 1.08x versus 3.15x for Vitesse Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.