BKV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mach Natural Resources LP has a net margin of -34.55% compared to BKV's net margin of 7.01%. BKV's return on equity of -12.23% beat Mach Natural Resources LP's return on equity of 28.43%.

BKV has a consensus price target of $28.38, signalling upside risk potential of 20.59%. On the other hand Mach Natural Resources LP has an analysts' consensus of $22.50 which suggests that it could grow by 48.91%. Given that Mach Natural Resources LP has higher upside potential than BKV, analysts believe Mach Natural Resources LP is more attractive than BKV.

BKV has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mach Natural Resources LP has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BKV has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mach Natural Resources LP offers a yield of 18.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. BKV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mach Natural Resources LP pays out 83.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Mach Natural Resources LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BKV quarterly revenues are $227.7M, which are larger than Mach Natural Resources LP quarterly revenues of $226.8M. BKV's net income of -$78.7M is lower than Mach Natural Resources LP's net income of $15.9M. Notably, BKV's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mach Natural Resources LP's PE ratio is 9.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BKV is 2.81x versus 1.61x for Mach Natural Resources LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Era Helium has a net margin of -34.55% compared to BKV's net margin of -1017.06%. BKV's return on equity of -12.23% beat New Era Helium's return on equity of --.

BKV has a consensus price target of $28.38, signalling upside risk potential of 20.59%. On the other hand New Era Helium has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BKV has higher upside potential than New Era Helium, analysts believe BKV is more attractive than New Era Helium.

BKV has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Era Helium has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BKV has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. New Era Helium offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BKV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. New Era Helium pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BKV quarterly revenues are $227.7M, which are larger than New Era Helium quarterly revenues of $326.5K. BKV's net income of -$78.7M is lower than New Era Helium's net income of -$3.3M. Notably, BKV's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while New Era Helium's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BKV is 2.81x versus 5.18x for New Era Helium. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oceaneering International has a net margin of -34.55% compared to BKV's net margin of 7.47%. BKV's return on equity of -12.23% beat Oceaneering International's return on equity of 26.18%.

BKV has a consensus price target of $28.38, signalling upside risk potential of 20.59%. On the other hand Oceaneering International has an analysts' consensus of $21.25 which suggests that it could grow by 0.71%. Given that BKV has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe BKV is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

BKV has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.483, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.256%.

BKV has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oceaneering International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BKV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oceaneering International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BKV quarterly revenues are $227.7M, which are smaller than Oceaneering International quarterly revenues of $674.5M. BKV's net income of -$78.7M is lower than Oceaneering International's net income of $50.4M. Notably, BKV's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oceaneering International's PE ratio is 11.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BKV is 2.81x versus 0.79x for Oceaneering International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prairie Operating has a net margin of -34.55% compared to BKV's net margin of -19.26%. BKV's return on equity of -12.23% beat Prairie Operating's return on equity of -42.11%.

BKV has a consensus price target of $28.38, signalling upside risk potential of 20.59%. On the other hand Prairie Operating has an analysts' consensus of $8.75 which suggests that it could grow by 150.72%. Given that Prairie Operating has higher upside potential than BKV, analysts believe Prairie Operating is more attractive than BKV.

BKV has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prairie Operating has a beta of 1.905, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.519%.

BKV has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Prairie Operating offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BKV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Prairie Operating pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BKV quarterly revenues are $227.7M, which are larger than Prairie Operating quarterly revenues of $13.6M. BKV's net income of -$78.7M is lower than Prairie Operating's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, BKV's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Prairie Operating's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BKV is 2.81x versus -- for Prairie Operating. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.