LOCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has a net margin of 4.6% compared to El Pollo Loco Holdings's net margin of 1.53%. El Pollo Loco Holdings's return on equity of 9.82% beat Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's return on equity of 12.91%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 36.45%. On the other hand Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has an analysts' consensus of $53.86 which suggests that it could fall by -10.76%. Given that El Pollo Loco Holdings has higher upside potential than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, analysts believe El Pollo Loco Holdings is more attractive than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a beta of 1.116, which suggesting that the stock is 11.557% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has a beta of 1.453, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.323%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. El Pollo Loco Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store pays out 283.61% of its earnings as a dividend.

El Pollo Loco Holdings quarterly revenues are $119.2M, which are smaller than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store quarterly revenues of $821.1M. El Pollo Loco Holdings's net income of $5.5M is lower than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's net income of $12.6M. Notably, El Pollo Loco Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.07x while Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's PE ratio is 23.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for El Pollo Loco Holdings is 0.64x versus 0.39x for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Darden Restaurants has a net margin of 4.6% compared to El Pollo Loco Holdings's net margin of 10.24%. El Pollo Loco Holdings's return on equity of 9.82% beat Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.6%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 36.45%. On the other hand Darden Restaurants has an analysts' consensus of $216.33 which suggests that it could fall by -3.76%. Given that El Pollo Loco Holdings has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe El Pollo Loco Holdings is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a beta of 1.116, which suggesting that the stock is 11.557% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.747, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.334%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Darden Restaurants offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share. El Pollo Loco Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants pays out 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

El Pollo Loco Holdings quarterly revenues are $119.2M, which are smaller than Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues of $3.2B. El Pollo Loco Holdings's net income of $5.5M is lower than Darden Restaurants's net income of $323.4M. Notably, El Pollo Loco Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.07x while Darden Restaurants's PE ratio is 25.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for El Pollo Loco Holdings is 0.64x versus 2.27x for Darden Restaurants. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a net margin of 4.6% compared to El Pollo Loco Holdings's net margin of 0.32%. El Pollo Loco Holdings's return on equity of 9.82% beat Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's return on equity of --.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 36.45%. On the other hand Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has an analysts' consensus of $9.88 which suggests that it could grow by 87.03%. Given that Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has higher upside potential than El Pollo Loco Holdings, analysts believe Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is more attractive than El Pollo Loco Holdings.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a beta of 1.116, which suggesting that the stock is 11.557% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a beta of 2.390, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.028%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. El Pollo Loco Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

El Pollo Loco Holdings quarterly revenues are $119.2M, which are smaller than Red Robin Gourmet Burgers quarterly revenues of $392.4M. El Pollo Loco Holdings's net income of $5.5M is higher than Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's net income of $1.2M. Notably, El Pollo Loco Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.07x while Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for El Pollo Loco Holdings is 0.64x versus 0.07x for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wingstop has a net margin of 4.6% compared to El Pollo Loco Holdings's net margin of 53.93%. El Pollo Loco Holdings's return on equity of 9.82% beat Wingstop's return on equity of --.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 36.45%. On the other hand Wingstop has an analysts' consensus of $334.73 which suggests that it could fall by -2.89%. Given that El Pollo Loco Holdings has higher upside potential than Wingstop, analysts believe El Pollo Loco Holdings is more attractive than Wingstop.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a beta of 1.116, which suggesting that the stock is 11.557% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wingstop has a beta of 1.879, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.866%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wingstop offers a yield of 0.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. El Pollo Loco Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop pays out 26.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

El Pollo Loco Holdings quarterly revenues are $119.2M, which are smaller than Wingstop quarterly revenues of $171.1M. El Pollo Loco Holdings's net income of $5.5M is lower than Wingstop's net income of $92.3M. Notably, El Pollo Loco Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.07x while Wingstop's PE ratio is 58.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for El Pollo Loco Holdings is 0.64x versus 15.66x for Wingstop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.