RRGB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has a net margin of 0.32% compared to Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's net margin of 1.53%. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's return on equity of -- beat Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's return on equity of 12.91%.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a consensus price target of $9.88, signalling upside risk potential of 74.78%. On the other hand Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has an analysts' consensus of $53.86 which suggests that it could fall by -12.66%. Given that Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has higher upside potential than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, analysts believe Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is more attractive than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a beta of 2.390, which suggesting that the stock is 139.028% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has a beta of 1.453, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.323%.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store pays out 283.61% of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers quarterly revenues are $392.4M, which are smaller than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store quarterly revenues of $821.1M. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's net income of $1.2M is lower than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's net income of $12.6M. Notably, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's PE ratio is 23.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is 0.07x versus 0.39x for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brinker International has a net margin of 0.32% compared to Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's net margin of 8.36%. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's return on equity of -- beat Brinker International's return on equity of 421.07%.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a consensus price target of $9.88, signalling upside risk potential of 74.78%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $170.65 which suggests that it could fall by -3.41%. Given that Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is more attractive than Brinker International.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a beta of 2.390, which suggesting that the stock is 139.028% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 1.709, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.92%.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers quarterly revenues are $392.4M, which are smaller than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's net income of $1.2M is lower than Brinker International's net income of $119.1M. Notably, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Brinker International's PE ratio is 24.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is 0.07x versus 1.59x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kura Sushi USA has a net margin of 0.32% compared to Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's net margin of -5.83%. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's return on equity of -- beat Kura Sushi USA's return on equity of -5.55%.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a consensus price target of $9.88, signalling upside risk potential of 74.78%. On the other hand Kura Sushi USA has an analysts' consensus of $78.44 which suggests that it could fall by -5.96%. Given that Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has higher upside potential than Kura Sushi USA, analysts believe Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is more attractive than Kura Sushi USA.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a beta of 2.390, which suggesting that the stock is 139.028% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kura Sushi USA has a beta of 1.612, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.218%.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kura Sushi USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kura Sushi USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers quarterly revenues are $392.4M, which are larger than Kura Sushi USA quarterly revenues of $64.9M. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's net income of $1.2M is higher than Kura Sushi USA's net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kura Sushi USA's PE ratio is 732.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is 0.07x versus 3.61x for Kura Sushi USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a net margin of 0.32% compared to Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's net margin of 4.6%. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's return on equity of -- beat El Pollo Loco Holdings's return on equity of 9.82%.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a consensus price target of $9.88, signalling upside risk potential of 74.78%. On the other hand El Pollo Loco Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 29.51%. Given that Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has higher upside potential than El Pollo Loco Holdings, analysts believe Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is more attractive than El Pollo Loco Holdings.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a beta of 2.390, which suggesting that the stock is 139.028% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison El Pollo Loco Holdings has a beta of 1.116, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.557%.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. El Pollo Loco Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. El Pollo Loco Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers quarterly revenues are $392.4M, which are larger than El Pollo Loco Holdings quarterly revenues of $119.2M. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's net income of $1.2M is lower than El Pollo Loco Holdings's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while El Pollo Loco Holdings's PE ratio is 12.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is 0.07x versus 0.67x for El Pollo Loco Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.