WING Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chipotle Mexican Grill has a net margin of 53.93% compared to Wingstop's net margin of 13.45%. Wingstop's return on equity of -- beat Chipotle Mexican Grill's return on equity of 43.78%.

Wingstop has a consensus price target of $326.47, signalling downside risk potential of -13.62%. On the other hand Chipotle Mexican Grill has an analysts' consensus of $57.69 which suggests that it could grow by 13.96%. Given that Chipotle Mexican Grill has higher upside potential than Wingstop, analysts believe Chipotle Mexican Grill is more attractive than Wingstop.

Wingstop has a beta of 1.879, which suggesting that the stock is 87.866% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chipotle Mexican Grill has a beta of 1.060, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.954%.

Wingstop has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.28%. Chipotle Mexican Grill offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wingstop pays 26.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Chipotle Mexican Grill pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wingstop quarterly revenues are $171.1M, which are smaller than Chipotle Mexican Grill quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Wingstop's net income of $92.3M is lower than Chipotle Mexican Grill's net income of $386.6M. Notably, Wingstop's price-to-earnings ratio is 63.90x while Chipotle Mexican Grill's PE ratio is 44.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wingstop is 17.07x versus 6.04x for Chipotle Mexican Grill. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McDonald's has a net margin of 53.93% compared to Wingstop's net margin of 31.37%. Wingstop's return on equity of -- beat McDonald's's return on equity of --.

Wingstop has a consensus price target of $326.47, signalling downside risk potential of -13.62%. On the other hand McDonald's has an analysts' consensus of $328.75 which suggests that it could grow by 9.43%. Given that McDonald's has higher upside potential than Wingstop, analysts believe McDonald's is more attractive than Wingstop.

Wingstop has a beta of 1.879, which suggesting that the stock is 87.866% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McDonald's has a beta of 0.555, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.455%.

Wingstop has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.28%. McDonald's offers a yield of 2.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.77 per share. Wingstop pays 26.55% of its earnings as a dividend. McDonald's pays out 59.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wingstop quarterly revenues are $171.1M, which are smaller than McDonald's quarterly revenues of $6B. Wingstop's net income of $92.3M is lower than McDonald's's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Wingstop's price-to-earnings ratio is 63.90x while McDonald's's PE ratio is 26.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wingstop is 17.07x versus 8.41x for McDonald's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sweetgreen has a net margin of 53.93% compared to Wingstop's net margin of -15.06%. Wingstop's return on equity of -- beat Sweetgreen's return on equity of -19.57%.

Wingstop has a consensus price target of $326.47, signalling downside risk potential of -13.62%. On the other hand Sweetgreen has an analysts' consensus of $23.27 which suggests that it could grow by 71.63%. Given that Sweetgreen has higher upside potential than Wingstop, analysts believe Sweetgreen is more attractive than Wingstop.

Wingstop has a beta of 1.879, which suggesting that the stock is 87.866% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sweetgreen has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Wingstop has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.28%. Sweetgreen offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wingstop pays 26.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Sweetgreen pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wingstop quarterly revenues are $171.1M, which are larger than Sweetgreen quarterly revenues of $166.3M. Wingstop's net income of $92.3M is higher than Sweetgreen's net income of -$25M. Notably, Wingstop's price-to-earnings ratio is 63.90x while Sweetgreen's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wingstop is 17.07x versus 2.28x for Sweetgreen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum Brands has a net margin of 53.93% compared to Wingstop's net margin of 14.16%. Wingstop's return on equity of -- beat Yum Brands's return on equity of --.

Wingstop has a consensus price target of $326.47, signalling downside risk potential of -13.62%. On the other hand Yum Brands has an analysts' consensus of $159.72 which suggests that it could grow by 10.98%. Given that Yum Brands has higher upside potential than Wingstop, analysts believe Yum Brands is more attractive than Wingstop.

Wingstop has a beta of 1.879, which suggesting that the stock is 87.866% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum Brands has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.185%.

Wingstop has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.28%. Yum Brands offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Wingstop pays 26.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands pays out 50.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wingstop quarterly revenues are $171.1M, which are smaller than Yum Brands quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Wingstop's net income of $92.3M is lower than Yum Brands's net income of $253M. Notably, Wingstop's price-to-earnings ratio is 63.90x while Yum Brands's PE ratio is 28.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wingstop is 17.07x versus 5.29x for Yum Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.