IREN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a net margin of 16.73% compared to IREN's net margin of --. IREN's return on equity of -3.18% beat Commonwealth Bank of Australia's return on equity of 13.22%.

IREN has a consensus price target of $18.52, signalling upside risk potential of 109.06%. On the other hand Commonwealth Bank of Australia has an analysts' consensus of $74.40 which suggests that it could fall by -33.51%. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than Commonwealth Bank of Australia, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than Commonwealth Bank of Australia.

IREN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.38%.

IREN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commonwealth Bank of Australia offers a yield of 2.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share. IREN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commonwealth Bank of Australia pays out 81.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Commonwealth Bank of Australia's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

IREN quarterly revenues are $144.8M, which are larger than Commonwealth Bank of Australia quarterly revenues of --. IREN's net income of $24.2M is higher than Commonwealth Bank of Australia's net income of --. Notably, IREN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Commonwealth Bank of Australia's PE ratio is 29.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IREN is 4.88x versus 10.62x for Commonwealth Bank of Australia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cycclone has a net margin of 16.73% compared to IREN's net margin of --. IREN's return on equity of -3.18% beat Cycclone's return on equity of --.

IREN has a consensus price target of $18.52, signalling upside risk potential of 109.06%. On the other hand Cycclone has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than Cycclone, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than Cycclone.

IREN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cycclone has a beta of 2.247, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 124.697%.

IREN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cycclone offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IREN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cycclone pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

IREN quarterly revenues are $144.8M, which are larger than Cycclone quarterly revenues of --. IREN's net income of $24.2M is higher than Cycclone's net income of --. Notably, IREN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cycclone's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IREN is 4.88x versus -- for Cycclone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Macquarie Group has a net margin of 16.73% compared to IREN's net margin of --. IREN's return on equity of -3.18% beat Macquarie Group's return on equity of 10.68%.

IREN has a consensus price target of $18.52, signalling upside risk potential of 109.06%. On the other hand Macquarie Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than Macquarie Group, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than Macquarie Group.

IREN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Macquarie Group has a beta of 1.441, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.098%.

IREN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Macquarie Group offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.40 per share. IREN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Macquarie Group pays out 58.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Macquarie Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

IREN quarterly revenues are $144.8M, which are larger than Macquarie Group quarterly revenues of --. IREN's net income of $24.2M is higher than Macquarie Group's net income of --. Notably, IREN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Macquarie Group's PE ratio is 21.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IREN is 4.88x versus 11.67x for Macquarie Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIPP International Industries has a net margin of 16.73% compared to IREN's net margin of --. IREN's return on equity of -3.18% beat SIPP International Industries's return on equity of --.

IREN has a consensus price target of $18.52, signalling upside risk potential of 109.06%. On the other hand SIPP International Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than SIPP International Industries, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than SIPP International Industries.

IREN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIPP International Industries has a beta of 0.191, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.853%.

IREN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIPP International Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IREN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIPP International Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

IREN quarterly revenues are $144.8M, which are larger than SIPP International Industries quarterly revenues of --. IREN's net income of $24.2M is higher than SIPP International Industries's net income of --. Notably, IREN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SIPP International Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IREN is 4.88x versus -- for SIPP International Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.