MARA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleanspark has a net margin of -249.29% compared to MARA Holdings's net margin of -76.38%. MARA Holdings's return on equity of -10.39% beat Cleanspark's return on equity of -11.15%.

MARA Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.35, signalling upside risk potential of 28.61%. On the other hand Cleanspark has an analysts' consensus of $19.22 which suggests that it could grow by 97.96%. Given that Cleanspark has higher upside potential than MARA Holdings, analysts believe Cleanspark is more attractive than MARA Holdings.

MARA Holdings has a beta of 6.611, which suggesting that the stock is 561.113% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleanspark has a beta of 4.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 323.561%.

MARA Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cleanspark offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MARA Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cleanspark pays out -2.35% of its earnings as a dividend.

MARA Holdings quarterly revenues are $213.9M, which are larger than Cleanspark quarterly revenues of $181.7M. MARA Holdings's net income of -$533.2M is lower than Cleanspark's net income of -$138.8M. Notably, MARA Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.51x while Cleanspark's PE ratio is 78.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MARA Holdings is 7.39x versus 4.75x for Cleanspark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coinbase Global has a net margin of -249.29% compared to MARA Holdings's net margin of 3.23%. MARA Holdings's return on equity of -10.39% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 15.99%.

MARA Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.35, signalling upside risk potential of 28.61%. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $261.83 which suggests that it could grow by 8.62%. Given that MARA Holdings has higher upside potential than Coinbase Global, analysts believe MARA Holdings is more attractive than Coinbase Global.

MARA Holdings has a beta of 6.611, which suggesting that the stock is 561.113% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MARA Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MARA Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MARA Holdings quarterly revenues are $213.9M, which are smaller than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $2B. MARA Holdings's net income of -$533.2M is lower than Coinbase Global's net income of $65.6M. Notably, MARA Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.51x while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 45.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MARA Holdings is 7.39x versus 9.37x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hut 8 has a net margin of -249.29% compared to MARA Holdings's net margin of 44.79%. MARA Holdings's return on equity of -10.39% beat Hut 8's return on equity of -6.47%.

MARA Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.35, signalling upside risk potential of 28.61%. On the other hand Hut 8 has an analysts' consensus of $25.38 which suggests that it could grow by 38.21%. Given that Hut 8 has higher upside potential than MARA Holdings, analysts believe Hut 8 is more attractive than MARA Holdings.

MARA Holdings has a beta of 6.611, which suggesting that the stock is 561.113% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hut 8 has a beta of 3.909, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 290.949%.

MARA Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hut 8 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MARA Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hut 8 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MARA Holdings quarterly revenues are $213.9M, which are larger than Hut 8 quarterly revenues of -$90.6M. MARA Holdings's net income of -$533.2M is lower than Hut 8's net income of -$133.9M. Notably, MARA Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.51x while Hut 8's PE ratio is 4.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MARA Holdings is 7.39x versus 7.20x for Hut 8. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -249.29% compared to MARA Holdings's net margin of -183.64%. MARA Holdings's return on equity of -10.39% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of -14.35%.

MARA Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.35, signalling upside risk potential of 28.61%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $15.60 which suggests that it could grow by 52.79%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than MARA Holdings, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than MARA Holdings.

MARA Holdings has a beta of 6.611, which suggesting that the stock is 561.113% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 352.9%.

MARA Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MARA Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MARA Holdings quarterly revenues are $213.9M, which are larger than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $161.4M. MARA Holdings's net income of -$533.2M is lower than Riot Platforms's net income of -$296.4M. Notably, MARA Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.51x while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 24.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MARA Holdings is 7.39x versus 6.82x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.