Will DigitalOcean Stock Bounce Back?
DigitalOcean (NYSE:DOCN) has run into the proverbial brick wall with…
Sell
35
MQBKY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$132.85
Seasonality move
:
1.99%
Day range:
$126.85 - $133.44
52-week range:
$98.20 - $165.98
Dividend yield:
3.05%
P/E ratio:
21.04x
P/S ratio:
11.49x
P/B ratio:
2.28x
Volume:
10.9K
Avg. volume:
25.5K
1-year change:
4.71%
Market cap:
$50.6B
Revenue:
$4.4B
EPS (TTM):
$6.31
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MQBKY
Macquarie Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CDBT
Cycclone
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMSQY
Computershare
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMWAY
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
|
$4.6B | -- | -- | -- | $74.40 |
|
IREN
IREN
|
$149.3M | $0.14 | 194.62% | 17997.5% | $18.52 |
|
SIPN
SIPP International Industries
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MQBKY
Macquarie Group
|
$132.68 | -- | $50.6B | 21.04x | $2.40 | 3.05% | 11.49x |
|
CDBT
Cycclone
|
$0.1500 | -- | $6.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CMSQY
Computershare
|
$25.79 | -- | $15.1B | 28.60x | $0.45 | 1.75% | 5.08x |
|
CMWAY
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
|
$112.85 | $74.40 | $188.7B | 29.58x | $1.41 | 2.78% | 10.71x |
|
IREN
IREN
|
$9.12 | $18.52 | $2.2B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 5.02x |
|
SIPN
SIPP International Industries
|
$0.0027 | -- | $1.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MQBKY
Macquarie Group
|
90.3% | 1.878 | 458.65% | 1.35x |
|
CDBT
Cycclone
|
-- | 4.503 | -- | -- |
|
CMSQY
Computershare
|
45.73% | 0.566 | 13.16% | 1.44x |
|
CMWAY
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
|
73.03% | 1.203 | 79.25% | 2.95x |
|
IREN
IREN
|
18.45% | 7.851 | 23.59% | 0.39x |
|
SIPN
SIPP International Industries
|
-- | -14.944 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MQBKY
Macquarie Group
|
-- | -- | 1.33% | 10.68% | -- | -- |
|
CDBT
Cycclone
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMSQY
Computershare
|
-- | -- | 13.84% | 26.84% | -- | -- |
|
CMWAY
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
|
-- | -- | 3.73% | 13.22% | -- | -- |
|
IREN
IREN
|
$137.4M | $24.6M | -2.85% | -3.18% | 25.64% | -- |
|
SIPN
SIPP International Industries
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Macquarie Group vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MQBKY or CDBT?
Cycclone has a net margin of -- compared to Macquarie Group's net margin of --. Macquarie Group's return on equity of 10.68% beat Cycclone's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MQBKYMacquarie Group-- -- $229.3B CDBTCycclone-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MQBKY or CDBT?
Macquarie Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cycclone has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Macquarie Group has higher upside potential than Cycclone, analysts believe Macquarie Group is more attractive than Cycclone.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MQBKYMacquarie Group0 0 0 CDBTCycclone0 0 0 -
Is MQBKY or CDBT More Risky?
Macquarie Group has a beta of 1.441, which suggesting that the stock is 44.098% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cycclone has a beta of 2.247, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 124.697%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MQBKY or CDBT?
Macquarie Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.05%. Cycclone offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Macquarie Group pays 58.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Cycclone pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Macquarie Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MQBKY or CDBT?
Macquarie Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cycclone quarterly revenues of --. Macquarie Group's net income of -- is lower than Cycclone's net income of --. Notably, Macquarie Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.04x while Cycclone's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Macquarie Group is 11.49x versus -- for Cycclone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MQBKYMacquarie Group11.49x 21.04x -- -- CDBTCycclone-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MQBKY or CMSQY?
Computershare has a net margin of -- compared to Macquarie Group's net margin of --. Macquarie Group's return on equity of 10.68% beat Computershare's return on equity of 26.84%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MQBKYMacquarie Group-- -- $229.3B CMSQYComputershare-- -- $3.5B -
What do Analysts Say About MQBKY or CMSQY?
Macquarie Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Computershare has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Macquarie Group has higher upside potential than Computershare, analysts believe Macquarie Group is more attractive than Computershare.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MQBKYMacquarie Group0 0 0 CMSQYComputershare0 0 0 -
Is MQBKY or CMSQY More Risky?
Macquarie Group has a beta of 1.441, which suggesting that the stock is 44.098% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Computershare has a beta of 0.563, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.73%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MQBKY or CMSQY?
Macquarie Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.05%. Computershare offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Macquarie Group pays 58.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Computershare pays out 77.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MQBKY or CMSQY?
Macquarie Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Computershare quarterly revenues of --. Macquarie Group's net income of -- is lower than Computershare's net income of --. Notably, Macquarie Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.04x while Computershare's PE ratio is 28.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Macquarie Group is 11.49x versus 5.08x for Computershare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MQBKYMacquarie Group11.49x 21.04x -- -- CMSQYComputershare5.08x 28.60x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MQBKY or CMWAY?
Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a net margin of -- compared to Macquarie Group's net margin of --. Macquarie Group's return on equity of 10.68% beat Commonwealth Bank of Australia's return on equity of 13.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MQBKYMacquarie Group-- -- $229.3B CMWAYCommonwealth Bank of Australia-- -- $173.6B -
What do Analysts Say About MQBKY or CMWAY?
Macquarie Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Commonwealth Bank of Australia has an analysts' consensus of $74.40 which suggests that it could fall by -34.07%. Given that Commonwealth Bank of Australia has higher upside potential than Macquarie Group, analysts believe Commonwealth Bank of Australia is more attractive than Macquarie Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MQBKYMacquarie Group0 0 0 CMWAYCommonwealth Bank of Australia0 0 0 -
Is MQBKY or CMWAY More Risky?
Macquarie Group has a beta of 1.441, which suggesting that the stock is 44.098% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.38%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MQBKY or CMWAY?
Macquarie Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.05%. Commonwealth Bank of Australia offers a yield of 2.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share. Macquarie Group pays 58.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Commonwealth Bank of Australia pays out 81.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MQBKY or CMWAY?
Macquarie Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Commonwealth Bank of Australia quarterly revenues of --. Macquarie Group's net income of -- is lower than Commonwealth Bank of Australia's net income of --. Notably, Macquarie Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.04x while Commonwealth Bank of Australia's PE ratio is 29.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Macquarie Group is 11.49x versus 10.71x for Commonwealth Bank of Australia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MQBKYMacquarie Group11.49x 21.04x -- -- CMWAYCommonwealth Bank of Australia10.71x 29.58x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MQBKY or IREN?
IREN has a net margin of -- compared to Macquarie Group's net margin of 16.73%. Macquarie Group's return on equity of 10.68% beat IREN's return on equity of -3.18%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MQBKYMacquarie Group-- -- $229.3B IRENIREN94.85% $0.00 $1.7B -
What do Analysts Say About MQBKY or IREN?
Macquarie Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IREN has an analysts' consensus of $18.52 which suggests that it could grow by 103.1%. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than Macquarie Group, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than Macquarie Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MQBKYMacquarie Group0 0 0 IRENIREN8 1 0 -
Is MQBKY or IREN More Risky?
Macquarie Group has a beta of 1.441, which suggesting that the stock is 44.098% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IREN has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MQBKY or IREN?
Macquarie Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.05%. IREN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Macquarie Group pays 58.87% of its earnings as a dividend. IREN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Macquarie Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MQBKY or IREN?
Macquarie Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IREN quarterly revenues of $144.8M. Macquarie Group's net income of -- is lower than IREN's net income of $24.2M. Notably, Macquarie Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.04x while IREN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Macquarie Group is 11.49x versus 5.02x for IREN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MQBKYMacquarie Group11.49x 21.04x -- -- IRENIREN5.02x -- $144.8M $24.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns MQBKY or SIPN?
SIPP International Industries has a net margin of -- compared to Macquarie Group's net margin of --. Macquarie Group's return on equity of 10.68% beat SIPP International Industries's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MQBKYMacquarie Group-- -- $229.3B SIPNSIPP International Industries-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MQBKY or SIPN?
Macquarie Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SIPP International Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Macquarie Group has higher upside potential than SIPP International Industries, analysts believe Macquarie Group is more attractive than SIPP International Industries.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MQBKYMacquarie Group0 0 0 SIPNSIPP International Industries0 0 0 -
Is MQBKY or SIPN More Risky?
Macquarie Group has a beta of 1.441, which suggesting that the stock is 44.098% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIPP International Industries has a beta of 0.191, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.853%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MQBKY or SIPN?
Macquarie Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.05%. SIPP International Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Macquarie Group pays 58.87% of its earnings as a dividend. SIPP International Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Macquarie Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MQBKY or SIPN?
Macquarie Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SIPP International Industries quarterly revenues of --. Macquarie Group's net income of -- is lower than SIPP International Industries's net income of --. Notably, Macquarie Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.04x while SIPP International Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Macquarie Group is 11.49x versus -- for SIPP International Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MQBKYMacquarie Group11.49x 21.04x -- -- SIPNSIPP International Industries-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Where Will Cognizant Stock Be In 5 Years?
Cognizant Technologies (NASDAQ:CTSH) is a global provider of IT services…
NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) and Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) are two of the hottest…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Buy
65
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 45x
Sell
33
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Alerts
Buy
60
MRUS alert for May 24
Merus NV [MRUS] is up 32.55% over the past day.
Buy
57
RGC alert for May 24
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 28.43% over the past day.
Buy
90
OKLO alert for May 24
Oklo [OKLO] is up 23.11% over the past day.
