CMSQY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

IREN has a net margin of -- compared to Computershare's net margin of -95.07%. Computershare's return on equity of 17.06% beat IREN's return on equity of -10.49%.

Computershare has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IREN has an analysts' consensus of $20.45 which suggests that it could grow by 73.2%. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than Computershare, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than Computershare.

Computershare has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.534% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IREN has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Computershare has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.79%. IREN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Computershare pays 77.6% of its earnings as a dividend. IREN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Computershare's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Computershare quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IREN quarterly revenues of $54.4M. Computershare's net income of -- is lower than IREN's net income of -$51.7M. Notably, Computershare's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.88x while IREN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Computershare is 4.34x versus 7.93x for IREN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Platinum Asset Management has a net margin of -- compared to Computershare's net margin of --. Computershare's return on equity of 17.06% beat Platinum Asset Management's return on equity of --.

Computershare has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Platinum Asset Management has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Computershare has higher upside potential than Platinum Asset Management, analysts believe Computershare is more attractive than Platinum Asset Management.

Computershare has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.534% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Platinum Asset Management has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Computershare has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.79%. Platinum Asset Management offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Computershare pays 77.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Platinum Asset Management pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Computershare's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Computershare quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Platinum Asset Management quarterly revenues of --. Computershare's net income of -- is lower than Platinum Asset Management's net income of --. Notably, Computershare's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.88x while Platinum Asset Management's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Computershare is 4.34x versus -- for Platinum Asset Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategic Elements has a net margin of -- compared to Computershare's net margin of --. Computershare's return on equity of 17.06% beat Strategic Elements's return on equity of -38.32%.

Computershare has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Strategic Elements has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Computershare has higher upside potential than Strategic Elements, analysts believe Computershare is more attractive than Strategic Elements.

Computershare has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.534% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategic Elements has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Computershare has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.79%. Strategic Elements offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Computershare pays 77.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Elements pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Computershare's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Computershare quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Strategic Elements quarterly revenues of --. Computershare's net income of -- is lower than Strategic Elements's net income of --. Notably, Computershare's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.88x while Strategic Elements's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Computershare is 4.34x versus 1,369.20x for Strategic Elements. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pacific Current Group has a net margin of -- compared to Computershare's net margin of --. Computershare's return on equity of 17.06% beat Pacific Current Group's return on equity of 20.17%.

Computershare has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacific Current Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Computershare has higher upside potential than Pacific Current Group, analysts believe Computershare is more attractive than Pacific Current Group.

Computershare has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.534% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacific Current Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Computershare has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.79%. Pacific Current Group offers a yield of 3.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Computershare pays 77.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Current Group pays out 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Computershare quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacific Current Group quarterly revenues of --. Computershare's net income of -- is lower than Pacific Current Group's net income of --. Notably, Computershare's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.88x while Pacific Current Group's PE ratio is 5.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Computershare is 4.34x versus 2.96x for Pacific Current Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.