GFS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intel has a net margin of 13.25% compared to GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net margin of -6.48%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's return on equity of -1.68% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.53%.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a consensus price target of $43.39, signalling upside risk potential of 11.01%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $21.29 which suggests that it could fall by -5.59%. Given that GLOBALFOUNDRIES has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe GLOBALFOUNDRIES is more attractive than Intel.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.119, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.905%.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intel offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. GLOBALFOUNDRIES pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $12.7B. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net income of $210M is higher than Intel's net income of -$821M. Notably, GLOBALFOUNDRIES's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.93x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GLOBALFOUNDRIES is 3.20x versus 1.83x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 13.25% compared to GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net margin of 35.53%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's return on equity of -1.68% beat KLA's return on equity of 104.91%.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a consensus price target of $43.39, signalling upside risk potential of 11.01%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $800.74 which suggests that it could fall by -9.93%. Given that GLOBALFOUNDRIES has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe GLOBALFOUNDRIES is more attractive than KLA.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.397, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.703%.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KLA offers a yield of 0.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. GLOBALFOUNDRIES pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net income of $210M is lower than KLA's net income of $1.1B. Notably, GLOBALFOUNDRIES's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.93x while KLA's PE ratio is 32.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GLOBALFOUNDRIES is 3.20x versus 10.34x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 13.25% compared to GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net margin of 9.39%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's return on equity of -1.68% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -3.57%.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a consensus price target of $43.39, signalling upside risk potential of 11.01%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $89.24 which suggests that it could grow by 18.65%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than GLOBALFOUNDRIES, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than GLOBALFOUNDRIES.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.759, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.9%.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. GLOBALFOUNDRIES pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.9B. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net income of $210M is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $177.9M. Notably, GLOBALFOUNDRIES's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.93x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GLOBALFOUNDRIES is 3.20x versus 10.04x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micron Technology has a net margin of 13.25% compared to GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net margin of 19.66%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's return on equity of -1.68% beat Micron Technology's return on equity of 10.22%.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a consensus price target of $43.39, signalling upside risk potential of 11.01%. On the other hand Micron Technology has an analysts' consensus of $126.95 which suggests that it could fall by -1.22%. Given that GLOBALFOUNDRIES has higher upside potential than Micron Technology, analysts believe GLOBALFOUNDRIES is more attractive than Micron Technology.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology has a beta of 1.282, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.172%.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Micron Technology offers a yield of 0.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. GLOBALFOUNDRIES pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Micron Technology quarterly revenues of $8.1B. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net income of $210M is lower than Micron Technology's net income of $1.6B. Notably, GLOBALFOUNDRIES's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.93x while Micron Technology's PE ratio is 30.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GLOBALFOUNDRIES is 3.20x versus 4.62x for Micron Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.