ADI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intel has a net margin of 21.58% compared to Analog Devices's net margin of -6.48%. Analog Devices's return on equity of 5.21% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.53%.

Analog Devices has a consensus price target of $245.49, signalling upside risk potential of 6.28%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $21.29 which suggests that it could grow by 0.47%. Given that Analog Devices has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Analog Devices is more attractive than Intel.

Analog Devices has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.066999999999995% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.119, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.905%.

Analog Devices has a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Intel offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Analog Devices pays 109.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend.

Analog Devices quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Analog Devices's net income of $569.8M is higher than Intel's net income of -$821M. Notably, Analog Devices's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.94x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Analog Devices is 11.73x versus 1.72x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 21.58% compared to Analog Devices's net margin of 35.53%. Analog Devices's return on equity of 5.21% beat KLA's return on equity of 104.91%.

Analog Devices has a consensus price target of $245.49, signalling upside risk potential of 6.28%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $800.74 which suggests that it could fall by -6.49%. Given that Analog Devices has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Analog Devices is more attractive than KLA.

Analog Devices has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.066999999999995% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.397, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.703%.

Analog Devices has a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. KLA offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. Analog Devices pays 109.8% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Analog Devices's is not.

Analog Devices quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Analog Devices's net income of $569.8M is lower than KLA's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Analog Devices's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.94x while KLA's PE ratio is 31.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Analog Devices is 11.73x versus 9.96x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microchip Technology has a net margin of 21.58% compared to Analog Devices's net margin of -15.93%. Analog Devices's return on equity of 5.21% beat Microchip Technology's return on equity of -0.01%.

Analog Devices has a consensus price target of $245.49, signalling upside risk potential of 6.28%. On the other hand Microchip Technology has an analysts' consensus of $66.66 which suggests that it could fall by -2.8%. Given that Analog Devices has higher upside potential than Microchip Technology, analysts believe Analog Devices is more attractive than Microchip Technology.

Analog Devices has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.066999999999995% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microchip Technology has a beta of 1.481, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.057%.

Analog Devices has a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Microchip Technology offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Analog Devices pays 109.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Microchip Technology pays out -195140% of its earnings as a dividend.

Analog Devices quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Microchip Technology quarterly revenues of $970.5M. Analog Devices's net income of $569.8M is higher than Microchip Technology's net income of -$154.6M. Notably, Analog Devices's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.94x while Microchip Technology's PE ratio is 87.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Analog Devices is 11.73x versus 8.42x for Microchip Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 21.58% compared to Analog Devices's net margin of 9.39%. Analog Devices's return on equity of 5.21% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -3.57%.

Analog Devices has a consensus price target of $245.49, signalling upside risk potential of 6.28%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $89.24 which suggests that it could grow by 26.07%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Analog Devices, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Analog Devices.

Analog Devices has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.066999999999995% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.759, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.9%.

Analog Devices has a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Analog Devices pays 109.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend.

Analog Devices quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Analog Devices's net income of $569.8M is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $177.9M. Notably, Analog Devices's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.94x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Analog Devices is 11.73x versus 9.45x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.