CLNE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Delek US Holdings has a net margin of -130.07% compared to Clean Energy Fuels's net margin of -6.54%. Clean Energy Fuels's return on equity of -28.41% beat Delek US Holdings's return on equity of -88.27%.

Clean Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $4.19, signalling upside risk potential of 128.9%. On the other hand Delek US Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.79 which suggests that it could fall by -20.18%. Given that Clean Energy Fuels has higher upside potential than Delek US Holdings, analysts believe Clean Energy Fuels is more attractive than Delek US Holdings.

Clean Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.570, which suggesting that the stock is 156.992% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Delek US Holdings has a beta of 0.744, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.581%.

Clean Energy Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Delek US Holdings offers a yield of 5.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Clean Energy Fuels pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Delek US Holdings pays out -11.46% of its earnings as a dividend.

Clean Energy Fuels quarterly revenues are $103.8M, which are smaller than Delek US Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Clean Energy Fuels's net income of -$135M is higher than Delek US Holdings's net income of -$172.7M. Notably, Clean Energy Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Delek US Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Energy Fuels is 0.98x versus 0.11x for Delek US Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of -130.07% compared to Clean Energy Fuels's net margin of -0.24%. Clean Energy Fuels's return on equity of -28.41% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 9.28%.

Clean Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $4.19, signalling upside risk potential of 128.9%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $165.10 which suggests that it could grow by 1.71%. Given that Clean Energy Fuels has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe Clean Energy Fuels is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

Clean Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.570, which suggesting that the stock is 156.992% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.254%.

Clean Energy Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Clean Energy Fuels pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clean Energy Fuels quarterly revenues are $103.8M, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $31.5B. Clean Energy Fuels's net income of -$135M is lower than Marathon Petroleum's net income of -$74M. Notably, Clean Energy Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 22.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Energy Fuels is 0.98x versus 0.39x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natural Gas Services Group has a net margin of -130.07% compared to Clean Energy Fuels's net margin of 11.73%. Clean Energy Fuels's return on equity of -28.41% beat Natural Gas Services Group's return on equity of 6.78%.

Clean Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $4.19, signalling upside risk potential of 128.9%. On the other hand Natural Gas Services Group has an analysts' consensus of $36.25 which suggests that it could grow by 48.2%. Given that Clean Energy Fuels has higher upside potential than Natural Gas Services Group, analysts believe Clean Energy Fuels is more attractive than Natural Gas Services Group.

Clean Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.570, which suggesting that the stock is 156.992% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Gas Services Group has a beta of 0.525, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.472%.

Clean Energy Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Natural Gas Services Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clean Energy Fuels pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Gas Services Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clean Energy Fuels quarterly revenues are $103.8M, which are larger than Natural Gas Services Group quarterly revenues of $41.4M. Clean Energy Fuels's net income of -$135M is lower than Natural Gas Services Group's net income of $4.9M. Notably, Clean Energy Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Natural Gas Services Group's PE ratio is 18.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Energy Fuels is 0.98x versus 1.91x for Natural Gas Services Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Par Pacific Holdings has a net margin of -130.07% compared to Clean Energy Fuels's net margin of -1.74%. Clean Energy Fuels's return on equity of -28.41% beat Par Pacific Holdings's return on equity of -4.89%.

Clean Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $4.19, signalling upside risk potential of 128.9%. On the other hand Par Pacific Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $20.97 which suggests that it could fall by -6.68%. Given that Clean Energy Fuels has higher upside potential than Par Pacific Holdings, analysts believe Clean Energy Fuels is more attractive than Par Pacific Holdings.

Clean Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.570, which suggesting that the stock is 156.992% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Par Pacific Holdings has a beta of 1.496, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.582%.

Clean Energy Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Par Pacific Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clean Energy Fuels pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Par Pacific Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clean Energy Fuels quarterly revenues are $103.8M, which are smaller than Par Pacific Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Clean Energy Fuels's net income of -$135M is lower than Par Pacific Holdings's net income of -$30.4M. Notably, Clean Energy Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Par Pacific Holdings's PE ratio is 2.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Energy Fuels is 0.98x versus 0.16x for Par Pacific Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.