CLMT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evolution Petroleum has a net margin of -9.14% compared to Calumet's net margin of 9.43%. Calumet's return on equity of -- beat Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 5.54%.

Calumet has a consensus price target of $24.60, signalling upside risk potential of 19.42%. On the other hand Evolution Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 52.81%. Given that Evolution Petroleum has higher upside potential than Calumet, analysts believe Evolution Petroleum is more attractive than Calumet.

Calumet has a beta of 1.906, which suggesting that the stock is 90.606% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.231%.

Calumet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Evolution Petroleum offers a yield of 9.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Calumet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution Petroleum pays out 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

Calumet quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues of $21.9M. Calumet's net income of -$100.6M is lower than Evolution Petroleum's net income of $2.1M. Notably, Calumet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Evolution Petroleum's PE ratio is 35.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calumet is 0.40x versus 1.88x for Evolution Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of -9.14% compared to Calumet's net margin of 24.92%. Calumet's return on equity of -- beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 14.68%.

Calumet has a consensus price target of $24.60, signalling upside risk potential of 19.42%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $215.17 which suggests that it could grow by 36.38%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Calumet, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Calumet.

Calumet has a beta of 1.906, which suggesting that the stock is 90.606% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.885, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.497%.

Calumet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 5.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Calumet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 45.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Calumet quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Calumet's net income of -$100.6M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $659M. Notably, Calumet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 9.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calumet is 0.40x versus 3.05x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vital Energy has a net margin of -9.14% compared to Calumet's net margin of 46.88%. Calumet's return on equity of -- beat Vital Energy's return on equity of 17.64%.

Calumet has a consensus price target of $24.60, signalling upside risk potential of 19.42%. On the other hand Vital Energy has an analysts' consensus of $39.58 which suggests that it could grow by 35.24%. Given that Vital Energy has higher upside potential than Calumet, analysts believe Vital Energy is more attractive than Calumet.

Calumet has a beta of 1.906, which suggesting that the stock is 90.606% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vital Energy has a beta of 3.191, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 219.055%.

Calumet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vital Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Calumet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vital Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Calumet quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Vital Energy quarterly revenues of $459.2M. Calumet's net income of -$100.6M is lower than Vital Energy's net income of $215.3M. Notably, Calumet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vital Energy's PE ratio is 2.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calumet is 0.40x versus 0.55x for Vital Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

W&T Offshore has a net margin of -9.14% compared to Calumet's net margin of -30.42%. Calumet's return on equity of -- beat W&T Offshore's return on equity of -579.3%.

Calumet has a consensus price target of $24.60, signalling upside risk potential of 19.42%. On the other hand W&T Offshore has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 553.6%. Given that W&T Offshore has higher upside potential than Calumet, analysts believe W&T Offshore is more attractive than Calumet.

Calumet has a beta of 1.906, which suggesting that the stock is 90.606% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W&T Offshore has a beta of 1.349, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.897%.

Calumet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. W&T Offshore offers a yield of 2.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Calumet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. W&T Offshore pays out 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. W&T Offshore's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Calumet quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than W&T Offshore quarterly revenues of $121.4M. Calumet's net income of -$100.6M is lower than W&T Offshore's net income of -$36.9M. Notably, Calumet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while W&T Offshore's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calumet is 0.40x versus 0.42x for W&T Offshore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.