CRGY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Civitas Resources has a net margin of -0.23% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 15.6%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of -2.3% beat Civitas Resources's return on equity of 12.78%.

Crescent Energy has a consensus price target of $14.15, signalling upside risk potential of 64.58%. On the other hand Civitas Resources has an analysts' consensus of $43.43 which suggests that it could grow by 52.76%. Given that Crescent Energy has higher upside potential than Civitas Resources, analysts believe Crescent Energy is more attractive than Civitas Resources.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Civitas Resources has a beta of 1.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.263%.

Crescent Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.58%. Civitas Resources offers a yield of 10.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Crescent Energy pays -56.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Civitas Resources pays out 58.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Civitas Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Energy quarterly revenues are $950.2M, which are smaller than Civitas Resources quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Crescent Energy's net income of -$2.2M is lower than Civitas Resources's net income of $186M. Notably, Crescent Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while Civitas Resources's PE ratio is 3.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy is 0.59x versus 0.55x for Civitas Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of -0.23% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 34.86%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of -2.3% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66%.

Crescent Energy has a consensus price target of $14.15, signalling upside risk potential of 64.58%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $182.94 which suggests that it could grow by 32.53%. Given that Crescent Energy has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe Crescent Energy is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.062, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.189%.

Crescent Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.58%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Crescent Energy pays -56.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Energy quarterly revenues are $950.2M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. Crescent Energy's net income of -$2.2M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Crescent Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 8.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy is 0.59x versus 2.59x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Murphy Oil has a net margin of -0.23% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 10.86%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of -2.3% beat Murphy Oil's return on equity of 7.22%.

Crescent Energy has a consensus price target of $14.15, signalling upside risk potential of 64.58%. On the other hand Murphy Oil has an analysts' consensus of $26.87 which suggests that it could grow by 19.3%. Given that Crescent Energy has higher upside potential than Murphy Oil, analysts believe Crescent Energy is more attractive than Murphy Oil.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Murphy Oil has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.31%.

Crescent Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.58%. Murphy Oil offers a yield of 5.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Crescent Energy pays -56.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Murphy Oil pays out 44.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Murphy Oil's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Energy quarterly revenues are $950.2M, which are larger than Murphy Oil quarterly revenues of $672.7M. Crescent Energy's net income of -$2.2M is lower than Murphy Oil's net income of $73M. Notably, Crescent Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while Murphy Oil's PE ratio is 8.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy is 0.59x versus 1.16x for Murphy Oil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vital Energy has a net margin of -0.23% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of -3.68%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of -2.3% beat Vital Energy's return on equity of -4.49%.

Crescent Energy has a consensus price target of $14.15, signalling upside risk potential of 64.58%. On the other hand Vital Energy has an analysts' consensus of $20.44 which suggests that it could grow by 22.2%. Given that Crescent Energy has higher upside potential than Vital Energy, analysts believe Crescent Energy is more attractive than Vital Energy.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vital Energy has a beta of 1.587, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.667%.

Crescent Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.58%. Vital Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crescent Energy pays -56.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Vital Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Crescent Energy quarterly revenues are $950.2M, which are larger than Vital Energy quarterly revenues of $512.2M. Crescent Energy's net income of -$2.2M is higher than Vital Energy's net income of -$18.8M. Notably, Crescent Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while Vital Energy's PE ratio is 2.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy is 0.59x versus 0.32x for Vital Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.