CART Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amazon.com has a net margin of 11.82% compared to Maplebear's net margin of 11%. Maplebear's return on equity of 14.13% beat Amazon.com's return on equity of 25.28%.

Maplebear has a consensus price target of $52.49, signalling upside risk potential of 16.79%. On the other hand Amazon.com has an analysts' consensus of $240.60 which suggests that it could grow by 10.82%. Given that Maplebear has higher upside potential than Amazon.com, analysts believe Maplebear is more attractive than Amazon.com.

Maplebear has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amazon.com has a beta of 1.336, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.628%.

Maplebear has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amazon.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maplebear pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amazon.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Maplebear quarterly revenues are $897M, which are smaller than Amazon.com quarterly revenues of $155.7B. Maplebear's net income of $106M is lower than Amazon.com's net income of $17.1B. Notably, Maplebear's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.57x while Amazon.com's PE ratio is 35.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maplebear is 3.72x versus 3.59x for Amazon.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Carvana has a net margin of 11.82% compared to Maplebear's net margin of 5.1%. Maplebear's return on equity of 14.13% beat Carvana's return on equity of 61.46%.

Maplebear has a consensus price target of $52.49, signalling upside risk potential of 16.79%. On the other hand Carvana has an analysts' consensus of $301.12 which suggests that it could fall by -1.75%. Given that Maplebear has higher upside potential than Carvana, analysts believe Maplebear is more attractive than Carvana.

Maplebear has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Carvana has a beta of 3.649, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 264.914%.

Maplebear has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Carvana offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maplebear pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carvana pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Maplebear quarterly revenues are $897M, which are smaller than Carvana quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Maplebear's net income of $106M is lower than Carvana's net income of $216M. Notably, Maplebear's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.57x while Carvana's PE ratio is 107.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maplebear is 3.72x versus 2.82x for Carvana. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DoorDash has a net margin of 11.82% compared to Maplebear's net margin of 6.37%. Maplebear's return on equity of 14.13% beat DoorDash's return on equity of 4.47%.

Maplebear has a consensus price target of $52.49, signalling upside risk potential of 16.79%. On the other hand DoorDash has an analysts' consensus of $220.30 which suggests that it could fall by -8.07%. Given that Maplebear has higher upside potential than DoorDash, analysts believe Maplebear is more attractive than DoorDash.

Maplebear has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DoorDash has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Maplebear has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DoorDash offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maplebear pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DoorDash pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Maplebear quarterly revenues are $897M, which are smaller than DoorDash quarterly revenues of $3B. Maplebear's net income of $106M is lower than DoorDash's net income of $193M. Notably, Maplebear's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.57x while DoorDash's PE ratio is 307.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maplebear is 3.72x versus 9.41x for DoorDash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Liquidity Services has a net margin of 11.82% compared to Maplebear's net margin of 6.06%. Maplebear's return on equity of 14.13% beat Liquidity Services's return on equity of 13.96%.

Maplebear has a consensus price target of $52.49, signalling upside risk potential of 16.79%. On the other hand Liquidity Services has an analysts' consensus of $41.00 which suggests that it could grow by 73.14%. Given that Liquidity Services has higher upside potential than Maplebear, analysts believe Liquidity Services is more attractive than Maplebear.

Maplebear has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.158, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.769%.

Maplebear has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Liquidity Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maplebear pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Liquidity Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Maplebear quarterly revenues are $897M, which are larger than Liquidity Services quarterly revenues of $116.4M. Maplebear's net income of $106M is higher than Liquidity Services's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Maplebear's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.57x while Liquidity Services's PE ratio is 29.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maplebear is 3.72x versus 1.72x for Liquidity Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.