AMZN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

eBay has a net margin of 11% compared to Amazon.com's net margin of 19.46%. Amazon.com's return on equity of 25.28% beat eBay's return on equity of 37.33%.

Amazon.com has a consensus price target of $245.80, signalling upside risk potential of 9.24%. On the other hand eBay has an analysts' consensus of $67.59 which suggests that it could fall by -12.34%. Given that Amazon.com has higher upside potential than eBay, analysts believe Amazon.com is more attractive than eBay.

Amazon.com has a beta of 1.333, which suggesting that the stock is 33.349% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eBay has a beta of 1.256, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.606%.

Amazon.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. eBay offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Amazon.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. eBay pays out 26.99% of its earnings as a dividend. eBay's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amazon.com quarterly revenues are $155.7B, which are larger than eBay quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Amazon.com's net income of $17.1B is higher than eBay's net income of $503M. Notably, Amazon.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.65x while eBay's PE ratio is 18.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amazon.com is 3.72x versus 3.66x for eBay. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expedia Group has a net margin of 11% compared to Amazon.com's net margin of -6.69%. Amazon.com's return on equity of 25.28% beat Expedia Group's return on equity of 48.92%.

Amazon.com has a consensus price target of $245.80, signalling upside risk potential of 9.24%. On the other hand Expedia Group has an analysts' consensus of $189.10 which suggests that it could grow by 2.98%. Given that Amazon.com has higher upside potential than Expedia Group, analysts believe Amazon.com is more attractive than Expedia Group.

Amazon.com has a beta of 1.333, which suggesting that the stock is 33.349% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group has a beta of 1.574, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.436%.

Amazon.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expedia Group offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Amazon.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amazon.com quarterly revenues are $155.7B, which are larger than Expedia Group quarterly revenues of $3B. Amazon.com's net income of $17.1B is higher than Expedia Group's net income of -$200M. Notably, Amazon.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.65x while Expedia Group's PE ratio is 21.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amazon.com is 3.72x versus 1.79x for Expedia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Starbucks has a net margin of 11% compared to Amazon.com's net margin of 4.39%. Amazon.com's return on equity of 25.28% beat Starbucks's return on equity of --.

Amazon.com has a consensus price target of $245.80, signalling upside risk potential of 9.24%. On the other hand Starbucks has an analysts' consensus of $93.88 which suggests that it could fall by -1.29%. Given that Amazon.com has higher upside potential than Starbucks, analysts believe Amazon.com is more attractive than Starbucks.

Amazon.com has a beta of 1.333, which suggesting that the stock is 33.349% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Starbucks has a beta of 1.016, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.625%.

Amazon.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Starbucks offers a yield of 2.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Amazon.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks pays out 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amazon.com quarterly revenues are $155.7B, which are larger than Starbucks quarterly revenues of $8.8B. Amazon.com's net income of $17.1B is higher than Starbucks's net income of $384.2M. Notably, Amazon.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.65x while Starbucks's PE ratio is 34.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amazon.com is 3.72x versus 2.97x for Starbucks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 11% compared to Amazon.com's net margin of 2.12%. Amazon.com's return on equity of 25.28% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Amazon.com has a consensus price target of $245.80, signalling upside risk potential of 9.24%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $304.17 which suggests that it could fall by -2.98%. Given that Amazon.com has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Amazon.com is more attractive than Tesla.

Amazon.com has a beta of 1.333, which suggesting that the stock is 33.349% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.394, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.423%.

Amazon.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amazon.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amazon.com quarterly revenues are $155.7B, which are larger than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Amazon.com's net income of $17.1B is higher than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Amazon.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.65x while Tesla's PE ratio is 172.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amazon.com is 3.72x versus 11.48x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.