LQDT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Maplebear has a net margin of 6.06% compared to Liquidity Services's net margin of 11.82%. Liquidity Services's return on equity of 13.96% beat Maplebear's return on equity of 14.13%.

Liquidity Services has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling upside risk potential of 67.62%. On the other hand Maplebear has an analysts' consensus of $52.92 which suggests that it could grow by 10.7%. Given that Liquidity Services has higher upside potential than Maplebear, analysts believe Liquidity Services is more attractive than Maplebear.

Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.802% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maplebear has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Liquidity Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Maplebear offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Liquidity Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Maplebear pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Liquidity Services quarterly revenues are $116.4M, which are smaller than Maplebear quarterly revenues of $897M. Liquidity Services's net income of $7.1M is lower than Maplebear's net income of $106M. Notably, Liquidity Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.96x while Maplebear's PE ratio is 31.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidity Services is 1.78x versus 3.96x for Maplebear. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DoorDash has a net margin of 6.06% compared to Liquidity Services's net margin of 6.37%. Liquidity Services's return on equity of 13.96% beat DoorDash's return on equity of 4.47%.

Liquidity Services has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling upside risk potential of 67.62%. On the other hand DoorDash has an analysts' consensus of $232.65 which suggests that it could fall by -0.79%. Given that Liquidity Services has higher upside potential than DoorDash, analysts believe Liquidity Services is more attractive than DoorDash.

Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.802% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DoorDash has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Liquidity Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DoorDash offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Liquidity Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DoorDash pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Liquidity Services quarterly revenues are $116.4M, which are smaller than DoorDash quarterly revenues of $3B. Liquidity Services's net income of $7.1M is lower than DoorDash's net income of $193M. Notably, Liquidity Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.96x while DoorDash's PE ratio is 300.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidity Services is 1.78x versus 9.21x for DoorDash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

1-800-Flowers.com has a net margin of 6.06% compared to Liquidity Services's net margin of -53.78%. Liquidity Services's return on equity of 13.96% beat 1-800-Flowers.com's return on equity of -38.44%.

Liquidity Services has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling upside risk potential of 67.62%. On the other hand 1-800-Flowers.com has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 66.67%. Given that Liquidity Services has higher upside potential than 1-800-Flowers.com, analysts believe Liquidity Services is more attractive than 1-800-Flowers.com.

Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.802% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 1-800-Flowers.com has a beta of 1.479, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.898%.

Liquidity Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 1-800-Flowers.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Liquidity Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 1-800-Flowers.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Liquidity Services quarterly revenues are $116.4M, which are smaller than 1-800-Flowers.com quarterly revenues of $331.5M. Liquidity Services's net income of $7.1M is higher than 1-800-Flowers.com's net income of -$178.2M. Notably, Liquidity Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.96x while 1-800-Flowers.com's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidity Services is 1.78x versus 0.20x for 1-800-Flowers.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steelcase has a net margin of 6.06% compared to Liquidity Services's net margin of 1.75%. Liquidity Services's return on equity of 13.96% beat Steelcase's return on equity of 13.2%.

Liquidity Services has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling upside risk potential of 67.62%. On the other hand Steelcase has an analysts' consensus of $16.25 which suggests that it could grow by 59.63%. Given that Liquidity Services has higher upside potential than Steelcase, analysts believe Liquidity Services is more attractive than Steelcase.

Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.802% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steelcase has a beta of 1.127, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.742%.

Liquidity Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steelcase offers a yield of 3.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Liquidity Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steelcase pays out 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Steelcase's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Liquidity Services quarterly revenues are $116.4M, which are smaller than Steelcase quarterly revenues of $779M. Liquidity Services's net income of $7.1M is lower than Steelcase's net income of $13.6M. Notably, Liquidity Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.96x while Steelcase's PE ratio is 9.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidity Services is 1.78x versus 0.37x for Steelcase. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.