AVO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amcon Distributing has a net margin of 4.88% compared to Mission Produce's net margin of 0.17%. Mission Produce's return on equity of 6.72% beat Amcon Distributing's return on equity of 4.01%.

Mission Produce has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.73%. On the other hand Amcon Distributing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mission Produce has higher upside potential than Amcon Distributing, analysts believe Mission Produce is more attractive than Amcon Distributing.

Mission Produce has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amcon Distributing has a beta of 0.574, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.577%.

Mission Produce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amcon Distributing offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Mission Produce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing pays out 14.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mission Produce quarterly revenues are $354.4M, which are smaller than Amcon Distributing quarterly revenues of $746.3M. Mission Produce's net income of $17.3M is higher than Amcon Distributing's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Mission Produce's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.31x while Amcon Distributing's PE ratio is 18.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mission Produce is 0.83x versus 0.03x for Amcon Distributing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SpartanNash has a net margin of 4.88% compared to Mission Produce's net margin of 0.49%. Mission Produce's return on equity of 6.72% beat SpartanNash's return on equity of 5.86%.

Mission Produce has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.73%. On the other hand SpartanNash has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25.34%. Given that SpartanNash has higher upside potential than Mission Produce, analysts believe SpartanNash is more attractive than Mission Produce.

Mission Produce has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SpartanNash has a beta of 0.345, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.539%.

Mission Produce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SpartanNash offers a yield of 4.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Mission Produce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SpartanNash pays out 56.78% of its earnings as a dividend. SpartanNash's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mission Produce quarterly revenues are $354.4M, which are smaller than SpartanNash quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Mission Produce's net income of $17.3M is higher than SpartanNash's net income of $10.9M. Notably, Mission Produce's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.31x while SpartanNash's PE ratio is 13.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mission Produce is 0.83x versus 0.07x for SpartanNash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sysco has a net margin of 4.88% compared to Mission Produce's net margin of 2.39%. Mission Produce's return on equity of 6.72% beat Sysco's return on equity of 89.41%.

Mission Produce has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.73%. On the other hand Sysco has an analysts' consensus of $84.70 which suggests that it could grow by 10.16%. Given that Mission Produce has higher upside potential than Sysco, analysts believe Mission Produce is more attractive than Sysco.

Mission Produce has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sysco has a beta of 1.196, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.642%.

Mission Produce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sysco offers a yield of 2.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Mission Produce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco pays out 51.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mission Produce quarterly revenues are $354.4M, which are smaller than Sysco quarterly revenues of $20.5B. Mission Produce's net income of $17.3M is lower than Sysco's net income of $490M. Notably, Mission Produce's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.31x while Sysco's PE ratio is 19.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mission Produce is 0.83x versus 0.48x for Sysco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Foods Holding has a net margin of 4.88% compared to Mission Produce's net margin of 1.52%. Mission Produce's return on equity of 6.72% beat US Foods Holding's return on equity of 12.04%.

Mission Produce has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.73%. On the other hand US Foods Holding has an analysts' consensus of $76.70 which suggests that it could grow by 13.03%. Given that Mission Produce has higher upside potential than US Foods Holding, analysts believe Mission Produce is more attractive than US Foods Holding.

Mission Produce has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Foods Holding has a beta of 1.676, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.63%.

Mission Produce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. US Foods Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mission Produce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. US Foods Holding pays out 1.38% of its earnings as a dividend. US Foods Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mission Produce quarterly revenues are $354.4M, which are smaller than US Foods Holding quarterly revenues of $9.7B. Mission Produce's net income of $17.3M is lower than US Foods Holding's net income of $148M. Notably, Mission Produce's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.31x while US Foods Holding's PE ratio is 29.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mission Produce is 0.83x versus 0.45x for US Foods Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.