VMC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MP Materials has a net margin of 7.89% compared to Vulcan Materials's net margin of -37.24%. Vulcan Materials's return on equity of 11.89% beat MP Materials's return on equity of -9.68%.

Vulcan Materials has a consensus price target of $294.39, signalling upside risk potential of 11.06%. On the other hand MP Materials has an analysts' consensus of $26.70 which suggests that it could grow by 22.53%. Given that MP Materials has higher upside potential than Vulcan Materials, analysts believe MP Materials is more attractive than Vulcan Materials.

Vulcan Materials has a beta of 0.834, which suggesting that the stock is 16.625% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MP Materials has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vulcan Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. MP Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vulcan Materials pays 26.8% of its earnings as a dividend. MP Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vulcan Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vulcan Materials quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than MP Materials quarterly revenues of $60.8M. Vulcan Materials's net income of $128.9M is higher than MP Materials's net income of -$22.6M. Notably, Vulcan Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.60x while MP Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vulcan Materials is 4.70x versus 16.56x for MP Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NioCorp Developments has a net margin of 7.89% compared to Vulcan Materials's net margin of --. Vulcan Materials's return on equity of 11.89% beat NioCorp Developments's return on equity of --.

Vulcan Materials has a consensus price target of $294.39, signalling upside risk potential of 11.06%. On the other hand NioCorp Developments has an analysts' consensus of $4.13 which suggests that it could grow by 79.35%. Given that NioCorp Developments has higher upside potential than Vulcan Materials, analysts believe NioCorp Developments is more attractive than Vulcan Materials.

Vulcan Materials has a beta of 0.834, which suggesting that the stock is 16.625% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NioCorp Developments has a beta of -0.084, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.442%.

Vulcan Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. NioCorp Developments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vulcan Materials pays 26.8% of its earnings as a dividend. NioCorp Developments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vulcan Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vulcan Materials quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than NioCorp Developments quarterly revenues of --. Vulcan Materials's net income of $128.9M is higher than NioCorp Developments's net income of -$5.3M. Notably, Vulcan Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.60x while NioCorp Developments's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vulcan Materials is 4.70x versus 5,553.42x for NioCorp Developments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Antimony has a net margin of 7.89% compared to Vulcan Materials's net margin of 7.81%. Vulcan Materials's return on equity of 11.89% beat United States Antimony's return on equity of -3.13%.

Vulcan Materials has a consensus price target of $294.39, signalling upside risk potential of 11.06%. On the other hand United States Antimony has an analysts' consensus of $4.94 which suggests that it could grow by 104.03%. Given that United States Antimony has higher upside potential than Vulcan Materials, analysts believe United States Antimony is more attractive than Vulcan Materials.

Vulcan Materials has a beta of 0.834, which suggesting that the stock is 16.625% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Antimony has a beta of 0.153, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.678%.

Vulcan Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. United States Antimony offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vulcan Materials pays 26.8% of its earnings as a dividend. United States Antimony pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vulcan Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vulcan Materials quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than United States Antimony quarterly revenues of $7M. Vulcan Materials's net income of $128.9M is higher than United States Antimony's net income of $546.5K. Notably, Vulcan Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.60x while United States Antimony's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vulcan Materials is 4.70x versus 14.23x for United States Antimony. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Lime & Minerals has a net margin of 7.89% compared to Vulcan Materials's net margin of 37.38%. Vulcan Materials's return on equity of 11.89% beat United States Lime & Minerals's return on equity of 25.53%.

Vulcan Materials has a consensus price target of $294.39, signalling upside risk potential of 11.06%. On the other hand United States Lime & Minerals has an analysts' consensus of $105.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.16%. Given that Vulcan Materials has higher upside potential than United States Lime & Minerals, analysts believe Vulcan Materials is more attractive than United States Lime & Minerals.

Vulcan Materials has a beta of 0.834, which suggesting that the stock is 16.625% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.970, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.035%.

Vulcan Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. United States Lime & Minerals offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Vulcan Materials pays 26.8% of its earnings as a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals pays out 5.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vulcan Materials quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than United States Lime & Minerals quarterly revenues of $91.3M. Vulcan Materials's net income of $128.9M is higher than United States Lime & Minerals's net income of $34.1M. Notably, Vulcan Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.60x while United States Lime & Minerals's PE ratio is 24.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vulcan Materials is 4.70x versus 8.75x for United States Lime & Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.