NB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Rocky Mountain Industrials has a net margin of -- compared to NioCorp Developments's net margin of --. NioCorp Developments's return on equity of -- beat Rocky Mountain Industrials's return on equity of --.

NioCorp Developments has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 478.23%. On the other hand Rocky Mountain Industrials has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NioCorp Developments has higher upside potential than Rocky Mountain Industrials, analysts believe NioCorp Developments is more attractive than Rocky Mountain Industrials.

NioCorp Developments has a beta of 0.166, which suggesting that the stock is 83.382% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rocky Mountain Industrials has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NioCorp Developments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rocky Mountain Industrials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NioCorp Developments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rocky Mountain Industrials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NioCorp Developments quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rocky Mountain Industrials quarterly revenues of --. NioCorp Developments's net income of -$2.1M is higher than Rocky Mountain Industrials's net income of --. Notably, NioCorp Developments's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rocky Mountain Industrials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NioCorp Developments is 4,371.70x versus 8.61x for Rocky Mountain Industrials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Star Gold has a net margin of -- compared to NioCorp Developments's net margin of --. NioCorp Developments's return on equity of -- beat Star Gold's return on equity of --.

NioCorp Developments has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 478.23%. On the other hand Star Gold has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NioCorp Developments has higher upside potential than Star Gold, analysts believe NioCorp Developments is more attractive than Star Gold.

NioCorp Developments has a beta of 0.166, which suggesting that the stock is 83.382% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Star Gold has a beta of 0.635, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.507%.

NioCorp Developments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Star Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NioCorp Developments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Star Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NioCorp Developments quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Star Gold quarterly revenues of --. NioCorp Developments's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Star Gold's net income of -$99.4K. Notably, NioCorp Developments's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Star Gold's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NioCorp Developments is 4,371.70x versus -- for Star Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Antimony has a net margin of -- compared to NioCorp Developments's net margin of -30.05%. NioCorp Developments's return on equity of -- beat United States Antimony's return on equity of -16.85%.

NioCorp Developments has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 478.23%. On the other hand United States Antimony has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 26.33%. Given that NioCorp Developments has higher upside potential than United States Antimony, analysts believe NioCorp Developments is more attractive than United States Antimony.

NioCorp Developments has a beta of 0.166, which suggesting that the stock is 83.382% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Antimony has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.678%.

NioCorp Developments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United States Antimony offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NioCorp Developments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. United States Antimony pays out -12.41% of its earnings as a dividend.

NioCorp Developments quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than United States Antimony quarterly revenues of $2.4M. NioCorp Developments's net income of -$2.1M is lower than United States Antimony's net income of -$727.5K. Notably, NioCorp Developments's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while United States Antimony's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NioCorp Developments is 4,371.70x versus 19.91x for United States Antimony. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Lime & Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to NioCorp Developments's net margin of 37.3%. NioCorp Developments's return on equity of -- beat United States Lime & Minerals's return on equity of 23.52%.

NioCorp Developments has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 478.23%. On the other hand United States Lime & Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NioCorp Developments has higher upside potential than United States Lime & Minerals, analysts believe NioCorp Developments is more attractive than United States Lime & Minerals.

NioCorp Developments has a beta of 0.166, which suggesting that the stock is 83.382% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.885, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.477%.

NioCorp Developments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United States Lime & Minerals offers a yield of 0.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. NioCorp Developments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals pays out 6.11% of its earnings as a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NioCorp Developments quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than United States Lime & Minerals quarterly revenues of $89.4M. NioCorp Developments's net income of -$2.1M is lower than United States Lime & Minerals's net income of $33.4M. Notably, NioCorp Developments's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while United States Lime & Minerals's PE ratio is 39.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NioCorp Developments is 4,371.70x versus 12.87x for United States Lime & Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.