MLM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NioCorp Developments has a net margin of 8.57% compared to Martin Marietta Materials's net margin of --. Martin Marietta Materials's return on equity of 11.74% beat NioCorp Developments's return on equity of --.

Martin Marietta Materials has a consensus price target of $592.40, signalling upside risk potential of 8.19%. On the other hand NioCorp Developments has an analysts' consensus of $4.13 which suggests that it could grow by 79.35%. Given that NioCorp Developments has higher upside potential than Martin Marietta Materials, analysts believe NioCorp Developments is more attractive than Martin Marietta Materials.

Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 0.886, which suggesting that the stock is 11.404% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NioCorp Developments has a beta of -0.084, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.442%.

Martin Marietta Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.57%. NioCorp Developments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Martin Marietta Materials pays 9.47% of its earnings as a dividend. NioCorp Developments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Martin Marietta Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Martin Marietta Materials quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than NioCorp Developments quarterly revenues of --. Martin Marietta Materials's net income of $116M is higher than NioCorp Developments's net income of -$5.3M. Notably, Martin Marietta Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.54x while NioCorp Developments's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Martin Marietta Materials is 5.06x versus 5,553.42x for NioCorp Developments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Antimony has a net margin of 8.57% compared to Martin Marietta Materials's net margin of 7.81%. Martin Marietta Materials's return on equity of 11.74% beat United States Antimony's return on equity of -3.13%.

Martin Marietta Materials has a consensus price target of $592.40, signalling upside risk potential of 8.19%. On the other hand United States Antimony has an analysts' consensus of $4.94 which suggests that it could grow by 104.03%. Given that United States Antimony has higher upside potential than Martin Marietta Materials, analysts believe United States Antimony is more attractive than Martin Marietta Materials.

Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 0.886, which suggesting that the stock is 11.404% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Antimony has a beta of 0.153, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.678%.

Martin Marietta Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.57%. United States Antimony offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Martin Marietta Materials pays 9.47% of its earnings as a dividend. United States Antimony pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Martin Marietta Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Martin Marietta Materials quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than United States Antimony quarterly revenues of $7M. Martin Marietta Materials's net income of $116M is higher than United States Antimony's net income of $546.5K. Notably, Martin Marietta Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.54x while United States Antimony's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Martin Marietta Materials is 5.06x versus 14.23x for United States Antimony. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Lime & Minerals has a net margin of 8.57% compared to Martin Marietta Materials's net margin of 37.38%. Martin Marietta Materials's return on equity of 11.74% beat United States Lime & Minerals's return on equity of 25.53%.

Martin Marietta Materials has a consensus price target of $592.40, signalling upside risk potential of 8.19%. On the other hand United States Lime & Minerals has an analysts' consensus of $105.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.16%. Given that Martin Marietta Materials has higher upside potential than United States Lime & Minerals, analysts believe Martin Marietta Materials is more attractive than United States Lime & Minerals.

Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 0.886, which suggesting that the stock is 11.404% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.970, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.035%.

Martin Marietta Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.57%. United States Lime & Minerals offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Martin Marietta Materials pays 9.47% of its earnings as a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals pays out 5.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Martin Marietta Materials quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than United States Lime & Minerals quarterly revenues of $91.3M. Martin Marietta Materials's net income of $116M is higher than United States Lime & Minerals's net income of $34.1M. Notably, Martin Marietta Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.54x while United States Lime & Minerals's PE ratio is 24.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Martin Marietta Materials is 5.06x versus 8.75x for United States Lime & Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vulcan Materials has a net margin of 8.57% compared to Martin Marietta Materials's net margin of 7.89%. Martin Marietta Materials's return on equity of 11.74% beat Vulcan Materials's return on equity of 11.89%.

Martin Marietta Materials has a consensus price target of $592.40, signalling upside risk potential of 8.19%. On the other hand Vulcan Materials has an analysts' consensus of $294.39 which suggests that it could grow by 11.06%. Given that Vulcan Materials has higher upside potential than Martin Marietta Materials, analysts believe Vulcan Materials is more attractive than Martin Marietta Materials.

Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 0.886, which suggesting that the stock is 11.404% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vulcan Materials has a beta of 0.834, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.625%.

Martin Marietta Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.57%. Vulcan Materials offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Martin Marietta Materials pays 9.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Vulcan Materials pays out 26.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Martin Marietta Materials quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Vulcan Materials quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Martin Marietta Materials's net income of $116M is lower than Vulcan Materials's net income of $128.9M. Notably, Martin Marietta Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.54x while Vulcan Materials's PE ratio is 37.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Martin Marietta Materials is 5.06x versus 4.70x for Vulcan Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.