UA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nike has a net margin of -5.71% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 7.05%. Under Armour's return on equity of -10.24% beat Nike's return on equity of 31.91%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 123.64%. On the other hand Nike has an analysts' consensus of $73.11 which suggests that it could grow by 18.52%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Nike.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.555, which suggesting that the stock is 55.506% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nike has a beta of 1.210, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.031%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nike offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike pays out 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Nike quarterly revenues of $11.3B. Under Armour's net income of -$67.5M is lower than Nike's net income of $794M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.15x while Nike's PE ratio is 20.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.53x versus 1.94x for Nike. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of -5.71% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 7.6%. Under Armour's return on equity of -10.24% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 29.99%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 123.64%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $308.83 which suggests that it could grow by 14.25%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Ralph Lauren, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Ralph Lauren.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.555, which suggesting that the stock is 55.506% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.510, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.974%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 27.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Under Armour's net income of -$67.5M is lower than Ralph Lauren's net income of $129M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.15x while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 23.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.53x versus 2.44x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VF has a net margin of -5.71% compared to Under Armour's net margin of -7.03%. Under Armour's return on equity of -10.24% beat VF's return on equity of -12.45%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 123.64%. On the other hand VF has an analysts' consensus of $14.59 which suggests that it could grow by 17.57%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than VF, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than VF.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.555, which suggesting that the stock is 55.506% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VF has a beta of 1.697, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.7%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VF offers a yield of 2.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VF pays out -73.88% of its earnings as a dividend.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than VF quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Under Armour's net income of -$67.5M is higher than VF's net income of -$150.8M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.15x while VF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.53x versus 0.51x for VF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.