UA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hanesbrands has a net margin of 12.18% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 3.2%. Under Armour's return on equity of -1.04% beat Hanesbrands's return on equity of -92.19%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 84.7%. On the other hand Hanesbrands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -1.97%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Hanesbrands, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Hanesbrands.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.665, which suggesting that the stock is 66.499% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hanesbrands has a beta of 1.637, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.696%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hanesbrands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hanesbrands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Hanesbrands quarterly revenues of $937.1M. Under Armour's net income of $170.4M is higher than Hanesbrands's net income of $30M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.21x while Hanesbrands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.62x versus 0.50x for Hanesbrands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of 12.18% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 8.57%. Under Armour's return on equity of -1.04% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 28.02%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 84.7%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $234.97 which suggests that it could grow by 1.47%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Ralph Lauren, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Ralph Lauren.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.665, which suggesting that the stock is 66.499% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.502, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.24%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 30.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Under Armour's net income of $170.4M is higher than Ralph Lauren's net income of $147.9M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.21x while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 22.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.62x versus 2.23x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 12.18% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 8.61%. Under Armour's return on equity of -1.04% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 84.7%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $283.88 which suggests that it could fall by -38.59%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Tesla.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.665, which suggesting that the stock is 66.499% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.098%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Under Armour's net income of $170.4M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.21x while Tesla's PE ratio is 126.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.62x versus 16.61x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.