VFC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kontoor Brands has a net margin of 1.89% compared to VF's net margin of 10.53%. VF's return on equity of -38.05% beat Kontoor Brands's return on equity of 68.44%.

VF has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.12%. On the other hand Kontoor Brands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.55%. Given that Kontoor Brands has higher upside potential than VF, analysts believe Kontoor Brands is more attractive than VF.

VF has a beta of 1.497, which suggesting that the stock is 49.653% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kontoor Brands has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.055%.

VF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Kontoor Brands offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. VF pays -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Kontoor Brands pays out 47% of its earnings as a dividend. Kontoor Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VF quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Kontoor Brands quarterly revenues of $670.2M. VF's net income of $52.2M is lower than Kontoor Brands's net income of $70.5M. Notably, VF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kontoor Brands's PE ratio is 19.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VF is 0.85x versus 1.89x for Kontoor Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leggett & Platt has a net margin of 1.89% compared to VF's net margin of 4.08%. VF's return on equity of -38.05% beat Leggett & Platt's return on equity of -72.58%.

VF has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.12%. On the other hand Leggett & Platt has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 37.17%. Given that Leggett & Platt has higher upside potential than VF, analysts believe Leggett & Platt is more attractive than VF.

VF has a beta of 1.497, which suggesting that the stock is 49.653% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leggett & Platt has a beta of 1.074, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.365%.

VF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Leggett & Platt offers a yield of 6.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. VF pays -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Leggett & Platt pays out -175% of its earnings as a dividend.

VF quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Leggett & Platt quarterly revenues of $1.1B. VF's net income of $52.2M is higher than Leggett & Platt's net income of $44.9M. Notably, VF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Leggett & Platt's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VF is 0.85x versus 0.30x for Leggett & Platt. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 1.89% compared to VF's net margin of -125.86%. VF's return on equity of -38.05% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -68.23%.

VF has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.12%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $15.03 which suggests that it could grow by 6.92%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than VF, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than VF.

VF has a beta of 1.497, which suggesting that the stock is 49.653% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

VF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VF pays -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VF quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $874M. VF's net income of $52.2M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$1.1B. Notably, VF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VF is 0.85x versus 3.05x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Standard Motor Products has a net margin of 1.89% compared to VF's net margin of 0.95%. VF's return on equity of -38.05% beat Standard Motor Products's return on equity of 5.54%.

VF has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.12%. On the other hand Standard Motor Products has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 30.23%. Given that Standard Motor Products has higher upside potential than VF, analysts believe Standard Motor Products is more attractive than VF.

VF has a beta of 1.497, which suggesting that the stock is 49.653% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Standard Motor Products has a beta of 0.522, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.771%.

VF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Standard Motor Products offers a yield of 3.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. VF pays -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Standard Motor Products pays out 73.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Standard Motor Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VF quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Standard Motor Products quarterly revenues of $399.3M. VF's net income of $52.2M is higher than Standard Motor Products's net income of $3.8M. Notably, VF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Standard Motor Products's PE ratio is 19.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VF is 0.85x versus 0.49x for Standard Motor Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.