TRV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 3.35% compared to The Travelers Companies's net margin of 3.62%. The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 15.98% beat Allstate's return on equity of 19.96%.

The Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $281.22, signalling upside risk potential of 11.51%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $229.18 which suggests that it could grow by 17.15%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.507, which suggesting that the stock is 49.316% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.333, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.698%.

The Travelers Companies has a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.69%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. The Travelers Companies pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues are $11.8B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. The Travelers Companies's net income of $395M is lower than Allstate's net income of $595M. Notably, The Travelers Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.73x while Allstate's PE ratio is 13.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Travelers Companies is 1.24x versus 0.80x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 3.35% compared to The Travelers Companies's net margin of -3.51%. The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 15.98% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82%.

The Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $281.22, signalling upside risk potential of 11.51%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $158.33 which suggests that it could grow by 7.18%. Given that The Travelers Companies has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe The Travelers Companies is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.507, which suggesting that the stock is 49.316% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.757, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.296%.

The Travelers Companies has a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.69%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. The Travelers Companies pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues are $11.8B, which are larger than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $2.6B. The Travelers Companies's net income of $395M is higher than Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M. Notably, The Travelers Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.73x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 16.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Travelers Companies is 1.24x versus 2.12x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hartford Insurance Group has a net margin of 3.35% compared to The Travelers Companies's net margin of 9.3%. The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 15.98% beat The Hartford Insurance Group's return on equity of 18.34%.

The Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $281.22, signalling upside risk potential of 11.51%. On the other hand The Hartford Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $136.54 which suggests that it could grow by 13.27%. Given that The Hartford Insurance Group has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe The Hartford Insurance Group is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.507, which suggesting that the stock is 49.316% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hartford Insurance Group has a beta of 0.693, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.725%.

The Travelers Companies has a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.69%. The Hartford Insurance Group offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. The Travelers Companies pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hartford Insurance Group pays out 18.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues are $11.8B, which are larger than The Hartford Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $6.8B. The Travelers Companies's net income of $395M is lower than The Hartford Insurance Group's net income of $630M. Notably, The Travelers Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.73x while The Hartford Insurance Group's PE ratio is 12.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Travelers Companies is 1.24x versus 1.33x for The Hartford Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 3.35% compared to The Travelers Companies's net margin of 12.58%. The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 15.98% beat Progressive's return on equity of 34.35%.

The Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $281.22, signalling upside risk potential of 11.51%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $286.0733 which suggests that it could grow by 16.07%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.507, which suggesting that the stock is 49.316% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.369, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.092%.

The Travelers Companies has a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.69%. Progressive offers a yield of 3.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. The Travelers Companies pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues are $11.8B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.4B. The Travelers Companies's net income of $395M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.6B. Notably, The Travelers Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.73x while Progressive's PE ratio is 16.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Travelers Companies is 1.24x versus 1.84x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.