MSI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comtech Telecommunications has a net margin of 17.01% compared to Motorola Solutions's net margin of -38.51%. Motorola Solutions's return on equity of 168.45% beat Comtech Telecommunications's return on equity of -65.2%.

Motorola Solutions has a consensus price target of $499.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.76%. On the other hand Comtech Telecommunications has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 237.84%. Given that Comtech Telecommunications has higher upside potential than Motorola Solutions, analysts believe Comtech Telecommunications is more attractive than Motorola Solutions.

Motorola Solutions has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 1.967% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comtech Telecommunications has a beta of 1.000, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.03200000000001%.

Motorola Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. Comtech Telecommunications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Motorola Solutions pays 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Comtech Telecommunications pays out -0.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Motorola Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Motorola Solutions quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Comtech Telecommunications quarterly revenues of $126.6M. Motorola Solutions's net income of $430M is higher than Comtech Telecommunications's net income of -$48.7M. Notably, Motorola Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.93x while Comtech Telecommunications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Motorola Solutions is 6.33x versus 0.09x for Comtech Telecommunications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CommScope Holding has a net margin of 17.01% compared to Motorola Solutions's net margin of 70.49%. Motorola Solutions's return on equity of 168.45% beat CommScope Holding's return on equity of --.

Motorola Solutions has a consensus price target of $499.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.76%. On the other hand CommScope Holding has an analysts' consensus of $4.80 which suggests that it could fall by -0.42%. Given that Motorola Solutions has higher upside potential than CommScope Holding, analysts believe Motorola Solutions is more attractive than CommScope Holding.

Motorola Solutions has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 1.967% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CommScope Holding has a beta of 2.065, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.463%.

Motorola Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. CommScope Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Motorola Solutions pays 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. CommScope Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Motorola Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Motorola Solutions quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than CommScope Holding quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Motorola Solutions's net income of $430M is lower than CommScope Holding's net income of $784M. Notably, Motorola Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.93x while CommScope Holding's PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Motorola Solutions is 6.33x versus 0.23x for CommScope Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harmonic has a net margin of 17.01% compared to Motorola Solutions's net margin of 4.46%. Motorola Solutions's return on equity of 168.45% beat Harmonic's return on equity of 12.43%.

Motorola Solutions has a consensus price target of $499.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.76%. On the other hand Harmonic has an analysts' consensus of $11.58 which suggests that it could grow by 27.57%. Given that Harmonic has higher upside potential than Motorola Solutions, analysts believe Harmonic is more attractive than Motorola Solutions.

Motorola Solutions has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 1.967% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harmonic has a beta of 1.032, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.202%.

Motorola Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. Harmonic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Motorola Solutions pays 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Harmonic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Motorola Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Motorola Solutions quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Harmonic quarterly revenues of $133.1M. Motorola Solutions's net income of $430M is higher than Harmonic's net income of $5.9M. Notably, Motorola Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.93x while Harmonic's PE ratio is 20.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Motorola Solutions is 6.33x versus 1.54x for Harmonic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ubiquiti has a net margin of 17.01% compared to Motorola Solutions's net margin of 22.8%. Motorola Solutions's return on equity of 168.45% beat Ubiquiti's return on equity of 381.02%.

Motorola Solutions has a consensus price target of $499.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.76%. On the other hand Ubiquiti has an analysts' consensus of $343.50 which suggests that it could fall by -16.93%. Given that Motorola Solutions has higher upside potential than Ubiquiti, analysts believe Motorola Solutions is more attractive than Ubiquiti.

Motorola Solutions has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 1.967% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ubiquiti has a beta of 1.320, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.979%.

Motorola Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. Ubiquiti offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Motorola Solutions pays 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Ubiquiti pays out 41.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Motorola Solutions quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Ubiquiti quarterly revenues of $599.9M. Motorola Solutions's net income of $430M is higher than Ubiquiti's net income of $136.8M. Notably, Motorola Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.93x while Ubiquiti's PE ratio is 56.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Motorola Solutions is 6.33x versus 11.63x for Ubiquiti. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.