HLIT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comtech Telecommunications has a net margin of 11.09% compared to Harmonic's net margin of -71.94%. Harmonic's return on equity of 21.14% beat Comtech Telecommunications's return on equity of -18.26%.

Harmonic has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.08%. On the other hand Comtech Telecommunications has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 71.63%. Given that Comtech Telecommunications has higher upside potential than Harmonic, analysts believe Comtech Telecommunications is more attractive than Harmonic.

Harmonic has a beta of 0.917, which suggesting that the stock is 8.333% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comtech Telecommunications has a beta of 1.568, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.818%.

Harmonic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comtech Telecommunications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harmonic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comtech Telecommunications pays out -0.27% of its earnings as a dividend.

Harmonic quarterly revenues are $195.8M, which are larger than Comtech Telecommunications quarterly revenues of $126.2M. Harmonic's net income of $21.7M is higher than Comtech Telecommunications's net income of -$90.8M. Notably, Harmonic's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.41x while Comtech Telecommunications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harmonic is 2.48x versus 0.21x for Comtech Telecommunications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inseego has a net margin of 11.09% compared to Harmonic's net margin of 16.6%. Harmonic's return on equity of 21.14% beat Inseego's return on equity of --.

Harmonic has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.08%. On the other hand Inseego has an analysts' consensus of $14.33 which suggests that it could grow by 38.22%. Given that Inseego has higher upside potential than Harmonic, analysts believe Inseego is more attractive than Harmonic.

Harmonic has a beta of 0.917, which suggesting that the stock is 8.333% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inseego has a beta of 1.481, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.117%.

Harmonic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inseego offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harmonic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inseego pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Harmonic quarterly revenues are $195.8M, which are larger than Inseego quarterly revenues of $54M. Harmonic's net income of $21.7M is higher than Inseego's net income of $9M. Notably, Harmonic's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.41x while Inseego's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harmonic is 2.48x versus 0.57x for Inseego. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KVH Industries has a net margin of 11.09% compared to Harmonic's net margin of -4.14%. Harmonic's return on equity of 21.14% beat KVH Industries's return on equity of -12.87%.

Harmonic has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.08%. On the other hand KVH Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.83%. Given that KVH Industries has higher upside potential than Harmonic, analysts believe KVH Industries is more attractive than Harmonic.

Harmonic has a beta of 0.917, which suggesting that the stock is 8.333% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KVH Industries has a beta of 0.636, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.429%.

Harmonic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KVH Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harmonic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KVH Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Harmonic quarterly revenues are $195.8M, which are larger than KVH Industries quarterly revenues of $29M. Harmonic's net income of $21.7M is higher than KVH Industries's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Harmonic's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.41x while KVH Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harmonic is 2.48x versus 0.87x for KVH Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Viavi Solutions has a net margin of 11.09% compared to Harmonic's net margin of -0.76%. Harmonic's return on equity of 21.14% beat Viavi Solutions's return on equity of -5.36%.

Harmonic has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.08%. On the other hand Viavi Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $10.85 which suggests that it could grow by 5.03%. Given that Harmonic has higher upside potential than Viavi Solutions, analysts believe Harmonic is more attractive than Viavi Solutions.

Harmonic has a beta of 0.917, which suggesting that the stock is 8.333% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Viavi Solutions has a beta of 0.919, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.144%.

Harmonic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Viavi Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harmonic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viavi Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Harmonic quarterly revenues are $195.8M, which are smaller than Viavi Solutions quarterly revenues of $238.2M. Harmonic's net income of $21.7M is higher than Viavi Solutions's net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Harmonic's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.41x while Viavi Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harmonic is 2.48x versus 2.32x for Viavi Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.