MAS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

W.W. Grainger has a net margin of 10.33% compared to Masco's net margin of 11.12%. Masco's return on equity of 939.57% beat W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 51.62%.

Masco has a consensus price target of $70.82, signalling upside risk potential of 13.16%. On the other hand W.W. Grainger has an analysts' consensus of $1,065.74 which suggests that it could fall by -2.05%. Given that Masco has higher upside potential than W.W. Grainger, analysts believe Masco is more attractive than W.W. Grainger.

Masco has a beta of 1.196, which suggesting that the stock is 19.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.214, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.419%.

Masco has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. W.W. Grainger offers a yield of 0.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share. Masco pays 30.9% of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger pays out 22.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Masco quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Masco's net income of $186M is lower than W.W. Grainger's net income of $479M. Notably, Masco's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.10x while W.W. Grainger's PE ratio is 27.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Masco is 1.76x versus 3.08x for W.W. Grainger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hayward Holdings has a net margin of 10.33% compared to Masco's net margin of 6.26%. Masco's return on equity of 939.57% beat Hayward Holdings's return on equity of 8.91%.

Masco has a consensus price target of $70.82, signalling upside risk potential of 13.16%. On the other hand Hayward Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.93 which suggests that it could grow by 12.97%. Given that Masco has higher upside potential than Hayward Holdings, analysts believe Masco is more attractive than Hayward Holdings.

Masco has a beta of 1.196, which suggesting that the stock is 19.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hayward Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Masco has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. Hayward Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Masco pays 30.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Hayward Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Masco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Masco quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Hayward Holdings quarterly revenues of $228.8M. Masco's net income of $186M is higher than Hayward Holdings's net income of $14.3M. Notably, Masco's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.10x while Hayward Holdings's PE ratio is 25.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Masco is 1.76x versus 2.93x for Hayward Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solidion Technology has a net margin of 10.33% compared to Masco's net margin of --. Masco's return on equity of 939.57% beat Solidion Technology's return on equity of --.

Masco has a consensus price target of $70.82, signalling upside risk potential of 13.16%. On the other hand Solidion Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Masco has higher upside potential than Solidion Technology, analysts believe Masco is more attractive than Solidion Technology.

Masco has a beta of 1.196, which suggesting that the stock is 19.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solidion Technology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Masco has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. Solidion Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Masco pays 30.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Solidion Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Masco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Masco quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Solidion Technology quarterly revenues of --. Masco's net income of $186M is higher than Solidion Technology's net income of $9.2M. Notably, Masco's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.10x while Solidion Technology's PE ratio is 0.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Masco is 1.76x versus -- for Solidion Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WESCO International has a net margin of 10.33% compared to Masco's net margin of 2.22%. Masco's return on equity of 939.57% beat WESCO International's return on equity of 14.48%.

Masco has a consensus price target of $70.82, signalling upside risk potential of 13.16%. On the other hand WESCO International has an analysts' consensus of $204.33 which suggests that it could grow by 17.99%. Given that WESCO International has higher upside potential than Masco, analysts believe WESCO International is more attractive than Masco.

Masco has a beta of 1.196, which suggesting that the stock is 19.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WESCO International has a beta of 1.833, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.339%.

Masco has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. WESCO International offers a yield of 0.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Masco pays 30.9% of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International pays out 19.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Masco quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than WESCO International quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Masco's net income of $186M is higher than WESCO International's net income of $118.4M. Notably, Masco's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.10x while WESCO International's PE ratio is 13.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Masco is 1.76x versus 0.40x for WESCO International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.