GWW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hayward Holdings has a net margin of 11.12% compared to W.W. Grainger's net margin of 6.26%. W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 51.62% beat Hayward Holdings's return on equity of 8.91%.

W.W. Grainger has a consensus price target of $1,080.97, signalling upside risk potential of 0.86%. On the other hand Hayward Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.93 which suggests that it could grow by 15.59%. Given that Hayward Holdings has higher upside potential than W.W. Grainger, analysts believe Hayward Holdings is more attractive than W.W. Grainger.

W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.214, which suggesting that the stock is 21.419% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hayward Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

W.W. Grainger has a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Hayward Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. W.W. Grainger pays 22.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Hayward Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Hayward Holdings quarterly revenues of $228.8M. W.W. Grainger's net income of $479M is higher than Hayward Holdings's net income of $14.3M. Notably, W.W. Grainger's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.52x while Hayward Holdings's PE ratio is 25.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W.W. Grainger is 3.03x versus 2.86x for Hayward Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MSC Industrial Direct has a net margin of 11.12% compared to W.W. Grainger's net margin of 4.41%. W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 51.62% beat MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 15.31%.

W.W. Grainger has a consensus price target of $1,080.97, signalling upside risk potential of 0.86%. On the other hand MSC Industrial Direct has an analysts' consensus of $82.14 which suggests that it could grow by 0.08%. Given that W.W. Grainger has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct, analysts believe W.W. Grainger is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct.

W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.214, which suggesting that the stock is 21.419% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.877, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.32%.

W.W. Grainger has a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. MSC Industrial Direct offers a yield of 4.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. W.W. Grainger pays 22.05% of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct pays out 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues of $891.7M. W.W. Grainger's net income of $479M is higher than MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $39.3M. Notably, W.W. Grainger's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.52x while MSC Industrial Direct's PE ratio is 21.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W.W. Grainger is 3.03x versus 1.23x for MSC Industrial Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ozop Energy Solutions has a net margin of 11.12% compared to W.W. Grainger's net margin of -3685%. W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 51.62% beat Ozop Energy Solutions's return on equity of --.

W.W. Grainger has a consensus price target of $1,080.97, signalling upside risk potential of 0.86%. On the other hand Ozop Energy Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that W.W. Grainger has higher upside potential than Ozop Energy Solutions, analysts believe W.W. Grainger is more attractive than Ozop Energy Solutions.

W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.214, which suggesting that the stock is 21.419% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ozop Energy Solutions has a beta of -3.379, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 437.949%.

W.W. Grainger has a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Ozop Energy Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. W.W. Grainger pays 22.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Ozop Energy Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Ozop Energy Solutions quarterly revenues of $42.3K. W.W. Grainger's net income of $479M is higher than Ozop Energy Solutions's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, W.W. Grainger's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.52x while Ozop Energy Solutions's PE ratio is 4.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W.W. Grainger is 3.03x versus 1.20x for Ozop Energy Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WESCO International has a net margin of 11.12% compared to W.W. Grainger's net margin of 2.22%. W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 51.62% beat WESCO International's return on equity of 14.48%.

W.W. Grainger has a consensus price target of $1,080.97, signalling upside risk potential of 0.86%. On the other hand WESCO International has an analysts' consensus of $206.83 which suggests that it could grow by 17.47%. Given that WESCO International has higher upside potential than W.W. Grainger, analysts believe WESCO International is more attractive than W.W. Grainger.

W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.214, which suggesting that the stock is 21.419% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WESCO International has a beta of 1.833, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.339%.

W.W. Grainger has a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. WESCO International offers a yield of 0.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. W.W. Grainger pays 22.05% of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International pays out 19.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are smaller than WESCO International quarterly revenues of $5.3B. W.W. Grainger's net income of $479M is higher than WESCO International's net income of $118.4M. Notably, W.W. Grainger's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.52x while WESCO International's PE ratio is 13.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W.W. Grainger is 3.03x versus 0.40x for WESCO International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.