GWW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ozop Energy Solutions has a net margin of 11.08% compared to W.W. Grainger's net margin of -2817.6%. W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 51.45% beat Ozop Energy Solutions's return on equity of --.

W.W. Grainger has a consensus price target of $950.98, signalling downside risk potential of -0.82%. On the other hand Ozop Energy Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that W.W. Grainger has higher upside potential than Ozop Energy Solutions, analysts believe W.W. Grainger is more attractive than Ozop Energy Solutions.

W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.828% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ozop Energy Solutions has a beta of -2.812, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 381.227%.

W.W. Grainger has a quarterly dividend of $2.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Ozop Energy Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. W.W. Grainger pays 21.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Ozop Energy Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Ozop Energy Solutions quarterly revenues of $74.3K. W.W. Grainger's net income of $486M is higher than Ozop Energy Solutions's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, W.W. Grainger's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.57x while Ozop Energy Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W.W. Grainger is 3.17x versus 1.96x for Ozop Energy Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SiteOne Landscape Supply has a net margin of 11.08% compared to W.W. Grainger's net margin of 3.67%. W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 51.45% beat SiteOne Landscape Supply's return on equity of 9.22%.

W.W. Grainger has a consensus price target of $950.98, signalling downside risk potential of -0.82%. On the other hand SiteOne Landscape Supply has an analysts' consensus of $175.33 which suggests that it could grow by 16.88%. Given that SiteOne Landscape Supply has higher upside potential than W.W. Grainger, analysts believe SiteOne Landscape Supply is more attractive than W.W. Grainger.

W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.828% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SiteOne Landscape Supply has a beta of 1.541, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.081%.

W.W. Grainger has a quarterly dividend of $2.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. SiteOne Landscape Supply offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. W.W. Grainger pays 21.43% of its earnings as a dividend. SiteOne Landscape Supply pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than SiteOne Landscape Supply quarterly revenues of $1.2B. W.W. Grainger's net income of $486M is higher than SiteOne Landscape Supply's net income of $44.4M. Notably, W.W. Grainger's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.57x while SiteOne Landscape Supply's PE ratio is 43.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W.W. Grainger is 3.17x versus 1.36x for SiteOne Landscape Supply. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solidion Technology has a net margin of 11.08% compared to W.W. Grainger's net margin of --. W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 51.45% beat Solidion Technology's return on equity of --.

W.W. Grainger has a consensus price target of $950.98, signalling downside risk potential of -0.82%. On the other hand Solidion Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that W.W. Grainger has higher upside potential than Solidion Technology, analysts believe W.W. Grainger is more attractive than Solidion Technology.

W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.828% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solidion Technology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

W.W. Grainger has a quarterly dividend of $2.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Solidion Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. W.W. Grainger pays 21.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Solidion Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Solidion Technology quarterly revenues of --. W.W. Grainger's net income of $486M is higher than Solidion Technology's net income of -$6.6M. Notably, W.W. Grainger's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.57x while Solidion Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W.W. Grainger is 3.17x versus -- for Solidion Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WESCO International has a net margin of 11.08% compared to W.W. Grainger's net margin of 3.72%. W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 51.45% beat WESCO International's return on equity of 14.01%.

W.W. Grainger has a consensus price target of $950.98, signalling downside risk potential of -0.82%. On the other hand WESCO International has an analysts' consensus of $193.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.34%. Given that WESCO International has higher upside potential than W.W. Grainger, analysts believe WESCO International is more attractive than W.W. Grainger.

W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.828% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WESCO International has a beta of 2.009, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.873%.

W.W. Grainger has a quarterly dividend of $2.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. WESCO International offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. W.W. Grainger pays 21.43% of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International pays out 17.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are smaller than WESCO International quarterly revenues of $5.5B. W.W. Grainger's net income of $486M is higher than WESCO International's net income of $204.3M. Notably, W.W. Grainger's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.57x while WESCO International's PE ratio is 14.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W.W. Grainger is 3.17x versus 0.42x for WESCO International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.