HAYW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

W.W. Grainger has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Hayward Holdings's net margin of 11.12%. Hayward Holdings's return on equity of 8.91% beat W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 51.62%.

Hayward Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.93, signalling upside risk potential of 15.42%. On the other hand W.W. Grainger has an analysts' consensus of $1,080.97 which suggests that it could grow by 5.58%. Given that Hayward Holdings has higher upside potential than W.W. Grainger, analysts believe Hayward Holdings is more attractive than W.W. Grainger.

Hayward Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.214, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.419%.

Hayward Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. W.W. Grainger offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share. Hayward Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger pays out 22.05% of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hayward Holdings quarterly revenues are $228.8M, which are smaller than W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Hayward Holdings's net income of $14.3M is lower than W.W. Grainger's net income of $479M. Notably, Hayward Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.09x while W.W. Grainger's PE ratio is 26.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hayward Holdings is 2.86x versus 2.90x for W.W. Grainger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Masco has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Hayward Holdings's net margin of 10.33%. Hayward Holdings's return on equity of 8.91% beat Masco's return on equity of 939.57%.

Hayward Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.93, signalling upside risk potential of 15.42%. On the other hand Masco has an analysts' consensus of $70.82 which suggests that it could grow by 12.07%. Given that Hayward Holdings has higher upside potential than Masco, analysts believe Hayward Holdings is more attractive than Masco.

Hayward Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Masco has a beta of 1.196, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.575%.

Hayward Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Masco offers a yield of 1.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Hayward Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Masco pays out 30.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Masco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hayward Holdings quarterly revenues are $228.8M, which are smaller than Masco quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Hayward Holdings's net income of $14.3M is lower than Masco's net income of $186M. Notably, Hayward Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.09x while Masco's PE ratio is 17.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hayward Holdings is 2.86x versus 1.78x for Masco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solidion Technology has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Hayward Holdings's net margin of --. Hayward Holdings's return on equity of 8.91% beat Solidion Technology's return on equity of --.

Hayward Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.93, signalling upside risk potential of 15.42%. On the other hand Solidion Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hayward Holdings has higher upside potential than Solidion Technology, analysts believe Hayward Holdings is more attractive than Solidion Technology.

Hayward Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solidion Technology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hayward Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solidion Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hayward Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solidion Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hayward Holdings quarterly revenues are $228.8M, which are larger than Solidion Technology quarterly revenues of --. Hayward Holdings's net income of $14.3M is higher than Solidion Technology's net income of $9.2M. Notably, Hayward Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.09x while Solidion Technology's PE ratio is 0.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hayward Holdings is 2.86x versus -- for Solidion Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WESCO International has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Hayward Holdings's net margin of 2.22%. Hayward Holdings's return on equity of 8.91% beat WESCO International's return on equity of 14.48%.

Hayward Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.93, signalling upside risk potential of 15.42%. On the other hand WESCO International has an analysts' consensus of $207.18 which suggests that it could grow by 13.75%. Given that Hayward Holdings has higher upside potential than WESCO International, analysts believe Hayward Holdings is more attractive than WESCO International.

Hayward Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WESCO International has a beta of 1.833, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.339%.

Hayward Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WESCO International offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Hayward Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International pays out 19.36% of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hayward Holdings quarterly revenues are $228.8M, which are smaller than WESCO International quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Hayward Holdings's net income of $14.3M is lower than WESCO International's net income of $118.4M. Notably, Hayward Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.09x while WESCO International's PE ratio is 13.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hayward Holdings is 2.86x versus 0.42x for WESCO International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.