ICE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CME Group has a net margin of 24.68% compared to Intercontinental Exchange's net margin of 58.22%. Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 10.23% beat CME Group's return on equity of 13.28%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a consensus price target of $192.69, signalling upside risk potential of 9.5%. On the other hand CME Group has an analysts' consensus of $271.59 which suggests that it could grow by 1.21%. Given that Intercontinental Exchange has higher upside potential than CME Group, analysts believe Intercontinental Exchange is more attractive than CME Group.

Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.116, which suggesting that the stock is 11.635% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CME Group has a beta of 0.451, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.901%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. CME Group offers a yield of 3.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share. Intercontinental Exchange pays 37.73% of its earnings as a dividend. CME Group pays out 101.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CME Group's is not.

Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than CME Group quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $797M is lower than CME Group's net income of $956.2M. Notably, Intercontinental Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.43x while CME Group's PE ratio is 27.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intercontinental Exchange is 8.32x versus 15.37x for CME Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a net margin of 24.68% compared to Intercontinental Exchange's net margin of -2.73%. Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 10.23% beat Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -0.64%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a consensus price target of $192.69, signalling upside risk potential of 9.5%. On the other hand Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $9.61 which suggests that it could grow by 6.57%. Given that Intercontinental Exchange has higher upside potential than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, analysts believe Intercontinental Exchange is more attractive than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings.

Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.116, which suggesting that the stock is 11.635% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Intercontinental Exchange pays 37.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays out -305.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues of $579.8M. Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $797M is higher than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of -$15.8M. Notably, Intercontinental Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.43x while Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intercontinental Exchange is 8.32x versus 1.63x for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nasdaq has a net margin of 24.68% compared to Intercontinental Exchange's net margin of 18.9%. Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 10.23% beat Nasdaq's return on equity of 11.5%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a consensus price target of $192.69, signalling upside risk potential of 9.5%. On the other hand Nasdaq has an analysts' consensus of $84.22 which suggests that it could fall by -1.67%. Given that Intercontinental Exchange has higher upside potential than Nasdaq, analysts believe Intercontinental Exchange is more attractive than Nasdaq.

Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.116, which suggesting that the stock is 11.635% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nasdaq has a beta of 1.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.362%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Nasdaq offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Intercontinental Exchange pays 37.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq pays out 48.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Nasdaq quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $797M is higher than Nasdaq's net income of $395M. Notably, Intercontinental Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.43x while Nasdaq's PE ratio is 38.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intercontinental Exchange is 8.32x versus 6.35x for Nasdaq. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

S&P Global has a net margin of 24.68% compared to Intercontinental Exchange's net margin of 28.86%. Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 10.23% beat S&P Global's return on equity of 10.35%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a consensus price target of $192.69, signalling upside risk potential of 9.5%. On the other hand S&P Global has an analysts' consensus of $585.97 which suggests that it could grow by 13.78%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than Intercontinental Exchange, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than Intercontinental Exchange.

Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.116, which suggesting that the stock is 11.635% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison S&P Global has a beta of 1.196, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.592%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. S&P Global offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. Intercontinental Exchange pays 37.73% of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global pays out 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than S&P Global quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $797M is lower than S&P Global's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Intercontinental Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.43x while S&P Global's PE ratio is 40.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intercontinental Exchange is 8.32x versus 11.03x for S&P Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.