DNB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coinbase Global has a net margin of -2.73% compared to Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net margin of 56.84%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -0.64% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 30.9%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a consensus price target of $9.61, signalling upside risk potential of 7.16%. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $259.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.42%. Given that Coinbase Global has higher upside potential than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, analysts believe Coinbase Global is more attractive than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays -305.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues are $579.8M, which are smaller than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of -$15.8M is lower than Coinbase Global's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 21.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is 1.62x versus 8.49x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intercontinental Exchange has a net margin of -2.73% compared to Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net margin of 24.68%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -0.64% beat Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 10.23%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a consensus price target of $9.61, signalling upside risk potential of 7.16%. On the other hand Intercontinental Exchange has an analysts' consensus of $192.44 which suggests that it could grow by 9.05%. Given that Intercontinental Exchange has higher upside potential than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, analysts believe Intercontinental Exchange is more attractive than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.125, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.526%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Intercontinental Exchange offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays -305.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange pays out 37.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues are $579.8M, which are smaller than Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of -$15.8M is lower than Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $797M. Notably, Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intercontinental Exchange's PE ratio is 36.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is 1.62x versus 8.34x for Intercontinental Exchange. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morningstar has a net margin of -2.73% compared to Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net margin of 13.49%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -0.64% beat Morningstar's return on equity of 25.24%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a consensus price target of $9.61, signalling upside risk potential of 7.16%. On the other hand Morningstar has an analysts' consensus of $333.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.18%. Given that Morningstar has higher upside potential than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, analysts believe Morningstar is more attractive than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morningstar has a beta of 0.994, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.607%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Morningstar offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays -305.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Morningstar pays out 18.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Morningstar's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues are $579.8M, which are smaller than Morningstar quarterly revenues of $581.9M. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of -$15.8M is lower than Morningstar's net income of $78.5M. Notably, Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Morningstar's PE ratio is 34.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is 1.62x versus 5.68x for Morningstar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

S&P Global has a net margin of -2.73% compared to Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net margin of 28.86%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -0.64% beat S&P Global's return on equity of 10.35%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a consensus price target of $9.61, signalling upside risk potential of 7.16%. On the other hand S&P Global has an analysts' consensus of $585.87 which suggests that it could grow by 15.42%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison S&P Global has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.865%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. S&P Global offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays -305.94% of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global pays out 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues are $579.8M, which are smaller than S&P Global quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of -$15.8M is lower than S&P Global's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while S&P Global's PE ratio is 39.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is 1.62x versus 10.87x for S&P Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.