SPGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CME Group has a net margin of 28.86% compared to S&P Global's net margin of 58.22%. S&P Global's return on equity of 10.35% beat CME Group's return on equity of 13.28%.

S&P Global has a consensus price target of $585.87, signalling upside risk potential of 15.42%. On the other hand CME Group has an analysts' consensus of $270.35 which suggests that it could fall by -4.13%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than CME Group, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than CME Group.

S&P Global has a beta of 1.229, which suggesting that the stock is 22.865% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CME Group has a beta of 0.447, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.307%.

S&P Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. CME Group offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share. S&P Global pays 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. CME Group pays out 101.66% of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CME Group's is not.

S&P Global quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than CME Group quarterly revenues of $1.6B. S&P Global's net income of $1.1B is higher than CME Group's net income of $956.2M. Notably, S&P Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.88x while CME Group's PE ratio is 28.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global is 10.87x versus 16.16x for CME Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Goldman Sachs Group has a net margin of 28.86% compared to S&P Global's net margin of 31.46%. S&P Global's return on equity of 10.35% beat The Goldman Sachs Group's return on equity of 12.29%.

S&P Global has a consensus price target of $585.87, signalling upside risk potential of 15.42%. On the other hand The Goldman Sachs Group has an analysts' consensus of $585.58 which suggests that it could grow by 3.51%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than The Goldman Sachs Group, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than The Goldman Sachs Group.

S&P Global has a beta of 1.229, which suggesting that the stock is 22.865% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Goldman Sachs Group has a beta of 1.321, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.124%.

S&P Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. The Goldman Sachs Group offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. S&P Global pays 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. The Goldman Sachs Group pays out 31.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are smaller than The Goldman Sachs Group quarterly revenues of $15.1B. S&P Global's net income of $1.1B is lower than The Goldman Sachs Group's net income of $4.7B. Notably, S&P Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.88x while The Goldman Sachs Group's PE ratio is 13.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global is 10.87x versus 3.43x for The Goldman Sachs Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KKR & has a net margin of 28.86% compared to S&P Global's net margin of 35.17%. S&P Global's return on equity of 10.35% beat KKR &'s return on equity of 5.17%.

S&P Global has a consensus price target of $585.87, signalling upside risk potential of 15.42%. On the other hand KKR & has an analysts' consensus of $139.30 which suggests that it could grow by 17.32%. Given that KKR & has higher upside potential than S&P Global, analysts believe KKR & is more attractive than S&P Global.

S&P Global has a beta of 1.229, which suggesting that the stock is 22.865% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KKR & has a beta of 1.914, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.408%.

S&P Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. KKR & offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. S&P Global pays 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. KKR & pays out 19.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than KKR & quarterly revenues of $3.2B. S&P Global's net income of $1.1B is lower than KKR &'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, S&P Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.88x while KKR &'s PE ratio is 36.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global is 10.87x versus 5.15x for KKR &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moodys has a net margin of 28.86% compared to S&P Global's net margin of 32.48%. S&P Global's return on equity of 10.35% beat Moodys's return on equity of 54.49%.

S&P Global has a consensus price target of $585.87, signalling upside risk potential of 15.42%. On the other hand Moodys has an analysts' consensus of $500.56 which suggests that it could grow by 6.12%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than Moodys, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than Moodys.

S&P Global has a beta of 1.229, which suggesting that the stock is 22.865% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moodys has a beta of 1.404, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.353%.

S&P Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Moodys offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. S&P Global pays 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Moodys pays out 30.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Moodys quarterly revenues of $1.9B. S&P Global's net income of $1.1B is higher than Moodys's net income of $625M. Notably, S&P Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.88x while Moodys's PE ratio is 40.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global is 10.87x versus 11.88x for Moodys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.