HAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 10.02% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 24.92%. Halliburton's return on equity of 26.15% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 14.68%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $37.20, signalling upside risk potential of 38.59%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $215.17 which suggests that it could grow by 36.38%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.903, which suggesting that the stock is 90.341% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.885, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.497%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 5.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Halliburton pays 21.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 45.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Halliburton's net income of $571M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $659M. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.35x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 9.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 1.03x versus 3.05x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a net margin of 10.02% compared to Halliburton's net margin of -72.12%. Halliburton's return on equity of 26.15% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -18.89%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $37.20, signalling upside risk potential of 38.59%. On the other hand Patterson-UTI Energy has an analysts' consensus of $10.81 which suggests that it could grow by 40.79%. Given that Patterson-UTI Energy has higher upside potential than Halliburton, analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more attractive than Halliburton.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.903, which suggesting that the stock is 90.341% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 2.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.951%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. Patterson-UTI Energy offers a yield of 4.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Halliburton pays 21.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out 40.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Halliburton's net income of $571M is higher than Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of -$978.8M. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.35x while Patterson-UTI Energy's PE ratio is 36.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 1.03x versus 0.54x for Patterson-UTI Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schlumberger has a net margin of 10.02% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 12.95%. Halliburton's return on equity of 26.15% beat Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.73%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $37.20, signalling upside risk potential of 38.59%. On the other hand Schlumberger has an analysts' consensus of $56.06 which suggests that it could grow by 48.59%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Halliburton, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Halliburton.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.903, which suggesting that the stock is 90.341% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schlumberger has a beta of 1.515, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.506%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. Schlumberger offers a yield of 2.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Halliburton pays 21.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger pays out 31.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are smaller than Schlumberger quarterly revenues of $9.2B. Halliburton's net income of $571M is lower than Schlumberger's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.35x while Schlumberger's PE ratio is 12.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 1.03x versus 1.51x for Schlumberger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Targa Resources has a net margin of 10.02% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 10.06%. Halliburton's return on equity of 26.15% beat Targa Resources's return on equity of 28.18%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $37.20, signalling upside risk potential of 38.59%. On the other hand Targa Resources has an analysts' consensus of $198.41 which suggests that it could grow by 9.79%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Targa Resources, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Targa Resources.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.903, which suggesting that the stock is 90.341% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Targa Resources has a beta of 2.281, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 128.053%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. Targa Resources offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Halliburton pays 21.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Targa Resources pays out 31.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Targa Resources quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Halliburton's net income of $571M is higher than Targa Resources's net income of $387.4M. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.35x while Targa Resources's PE ratio is 32.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 1.03x versus 2.48x for Targa Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.