HAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

TechnipFMC PLC has a net margin of 3.77% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 6.36%. Halliburton's return on equity of 20.56% beat TechnipFMC PLC's return on equity of 26.52%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $29.34, signalling upside risk potential of 44.95%. On the other hand TechnipFMC PLC has an analysts' consensus of $34.83 which suggests that it could grow by 17.26%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than TechnipFMC PLC, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than TechnipFMC PLC.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.186, which suggesting that the stock is 18.638% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TechnipFMC PLC has a beta of 1.020, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.033%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. TechnipFMC PLC offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Halliburton pays 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. TechnipFMC PLC pays out 10.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are larger than TechnipFMC PLC quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Halliburton's net income of $204M is higher than TechnipFMC PLC's net income of $142M. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.47x while TechnipFMC PLC's PE ratio is 15.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 0.79x versus 1.40x for TechnipFMC PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Liberty Energy has a net margin of 3.77% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 2.06%. Halliburton's return on equity of 20.56% beat Liberty Energy's return on equity of 13.05%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $29.34, signalling upside risk potential of 44.95%. On the other hand Liberty Energy has an analysts' consensus of $16.58 which suggests that it could grow by 39.19%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Liberty Energy, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Liberty Energy.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.186, which suggesting that the stock is 18.638% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.707, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.34%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. Liberty Energy offers a yield of 2.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Halliburton pays 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Liberty Energy pays out 15.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are larger than Liberty Energy quarterly revenues of $977.5M. Halliburton's net income of $204M is higher than Liberty Energy's net income of $20.1M. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.47x while Liberty Energy's PE ratio is 7.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 0.79x versus 0.47x for Liberty Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oceaneering International has a net margin of 3.77% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 7.47%. Halliburton's return on equity of 20.56% beat Oceaneering International's return on equity of 26.18%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $29.34, signalling upside risk potential of 44.95%. On the other hand Oceaneering International has an analysts' consensus of $20.50 which suggests that it could grow by 8.01%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.186, which suggesting that the stock is 18.638% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.538, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.803%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. Oceaneering International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Halliburton pays 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Oceaneering International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are larger than Oceaneering International quarterly revenues of $674.5M. Halliburton's net income of $204M is higher than Oceaneering International's net income of $50.4M. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.47x while Oceaneering International's PE ratio is 10.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 0.79x versus 0.71x for Oceaneering International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schlumberger has a net margin of 3.77% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 9.39%. Halliburton's return on equity of 20.56% beat Schlumberger's return on equity of 19.04%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $29.34, signalling upside risk potential of 44.95%. On the other hand Schlumberger has an analysts' consensus of $47.74 which suggests that it could grow by 39.1%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Schlumberger, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Schlumberger.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.186, which suggesting that the stock is 18.638% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schlumberger has a beta of 1.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.627%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. Schlumberger offers a yield of 3.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Halliburton pays 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger pays out 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are smaller than Schlumberger quarterly revenues of $8.5B. Halliburton's net income of $204M is lower than Schlumberger's net income of $797M. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.47x while Schlumberger's PE ratio is 11.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 0.79x versus 1.35x for Schlumberger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.