Financhill
Sell
50

EMN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$75.79
Seasonality move :
-3.47%
Day range:
$76.05 - $77.65
52-week range:
$70.90 - $114.50
Dividend yield:
4.28%
P/E ratio:
9.80x
P/S ratio:
0.97x
P/B ratio:
1.52x
Volume:
1.6M
Avg. volume:
1.9M
1-year change:
-22.58%
Market cap:
$8.9B
Revenue:
$9.4B
EPS (TTM):
$7.86

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
EMN
Eastman Chemical
$2.3B $1.89 -1.94% -6.54% $97.67
CENX
Century Aluminum
$527M $0.59 8.08% -73.89% $22.67
DOW
Dow
$10.3B -$0.01 -5.02% -99.9% $36.36
FRD
Friedman Industries
-- -- -- -- --
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
-- -$0.02 -- -33.33% $1.40
XPL
Solitario Resources
-- -$0.01 -- -100% $1.50
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
EMN
Eastman Chemical
$77.04 $97.67 $8.9B 9.80x $0.83 4.28% 0.97x
CENX
Century Aluminum
$18.39 $22.67 $1.7B 15.85x $0.00 0% 0.75x
DOW
Dow
$30.57 $36.36 $21.6B 76.43x $0.70 9.16% 0.51x
FRD
Friedman Industries
$16.61 -- $117.3M 19.31x $0.04 0.96% 0.26x
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
$0.62 $1.40 $44.4M -- $0.00 0% --
XPL
Solitario Resources
$0.67 $1.50 $55.1M -- $0.00 0% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
EMN
Eastman Chemical
46.1% 1.283 49% 0.74x
CENX
Century Aluminum
39.92% 1.320 28.46% 0.54x
DOW
Dow
48.14% 0.229 61.87% 0.82x
FRD
Friedman Industries
26.49% 0.009 46.25% 1.34x
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
-- 0.662 -- --
XPL
Solitario Resources
-- 0.347 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
EMN
Eastman Chemical
$567M $318M 8.53% 15.99% 13.36% -$314M
CENX
Century Aluminum
$60.6M $46.1M 10.58% 18.99% 6.17% $51.1M
DOW
Dow
$671M $29M 0.85% 1.6% -1.52% -$594M
FRD
Friedman Industries
$17.3M $5.7M 3.59% 4.71% 5.9% -$12.8M
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
-$185.4K -$2.2M -- -- -- -$1.6M
XPL
Solitario Resources
-$7K -$736K -- -- -- -$598K

Eastman Chemical vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns EMN or CENX?

    Century Aluminum has a net margin of 7.95% compared to Eastman Chemical's net margin of 4.69%. Eastman Chemical's return on equity of 15.99% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 18.99%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    24.76% $1.57 $11B
    CENX
    Century Aluminum
    9.56% $0.29 $1.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About EMN or CENX?

    Eastman Chemical has a consensus price target of $97.67, signalling upside risk potential of 26.78%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $22.67 which suggests that it could grow by 23.26%. Given that Eastman Chemical has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum, analysts believe Eastman Chemical is more attractive than Century Aluminum.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    10 5 0
    CENX
    Century Aluminum
    2 0 0
  • Is EMN or CENX More Risky?

    Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.248, which suggesting that the stock is 24.845% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.545, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 154.539%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMN or CENX?

    Eastman Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.28%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eastman Chemical pays 41.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eastman Chemical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EMN or CENX?

    Eastman Chemical quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $633.9M. Eastman Chemical's net income of $182M is higher than Century Aluminum's net income of $29.7M. Notably, Eastman Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.80x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 15.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical is 0.97x versus 0.75x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    0.97x 9.80x $2.3B $182M
    CENX
    Century Aluminum
    0.75x 15.85x $633.9M $29.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns EMN or DOW?

    Dow has a net margin of 7.95% compared to Eastman Chemical's net margin of -2.94%. Eastman Chemical's return on equity of 15.99% beat Dow's return on equity of 1.6%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    24.76% $1.57 $11B
    DOW
    Dow
    6.43% -$0.44 $32.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About EMN or DOW?

    Eastman Chemical has a consensus price target of $97.67, signalling upside risk potential of 26.78%. On the other hand Dow has an analysts' consensus of $36.36 which suggests that it could grow by 18.94%. Given that Eastman Chemical has higher upside potential than Dow, analysts believe Eastman Chemical is more attractive than Dow.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    10 5 0
    DOW
    Dow
    4 15 0
  • Is EMN or DOW More Risky?

    Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.248, which suggesting that the stock is 24.845% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dow has a beta of 0.914, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.609%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMN or DOW?

    Eastman Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.28%. Dow offers a yield of 9.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Eastman Chemical pays 41.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Dow pays out 176.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Eastman Chemical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Dow's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EMN or DOW?

    Eastman Chemical quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Dow quarterly revenues of $10.4B. Eastman Chemical's net income of $182M is higher than Dow's net income of -$307M. Notably, Eastman Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.80x while Dow's PE ratio is 76.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical is 0.97x versus 0.51x for Dow. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    0.97x 9.80x $2.3B $182M
    DOW
    Dow
    0.51x 76.43x $10.4B -$307M
  • Which has Higher Returns EMN or FRD?

    Friedman Industries has a net margin of 7.95% compared to Eastman Chemical's net margin of 4.14%. Eastman Chemical's return on equity of 15.99% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.71%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    24.76% $1.57 $11B
    FRD
    Friedman Industries
    13.38% $0.76 $180.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About EMN or FRD?

    Eastman Chemical has a consensus price target of $97.67, signalling upside risk potential of 26.78%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eastman Chemical has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Eastman Chemical is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    10 5 0
    FRD
    Friedman Industries
    0 0 0
  • Is EMN or FRD More Risky?

    Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.248, which suggesting that the stock is 24.845% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.509, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.9%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMN or FRD?

    Eastman Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.28%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Eastman Chemical pays 41.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EMN or FRD?

    Eastman Chemical quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $129.2M. Eastman Chemical's net income of $182M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of $5.3M. Notably, Eastman Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.80x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 19.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical is 0.97x versus 0.26x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    0.97x 9.80x $2.3B $182M
    FRD
    Friedman Industries
    0.26x 19.31x $129.2M $5.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns EMN or PZG?

    Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 7.95% compared to Eastman Chemical's net margin of --. Eastman Chemical's return on equity of 15.99% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    24.76% $1.57 $11B
    PZG
    Paramount Gold Nevada
    -- -$0.04 --
  • What do Analysts Say About EMN or PZG?

    Eastman Chemical has a consensus price target of $97.67, signalling upside risk potential of 26.78%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 125.37%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Eastman Chemical, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Eastman Chemical.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    10 5 0
    PZG
    Paramount Gold Nevada
    1 0 0
  • Is EMN or PZG More Risky?

    Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.248, which suggesting that the stock is 24.845% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.978%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMN or PZG?

    Eastman Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.28%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eastman Chemical pays 41.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eastman Chemical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EMN or PZG?

    Eastman Chemical quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Eastman Chemical's net income of $182M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Eastman Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.80x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical is 0.97x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    0.97x 9.80x $2.3B $182M
    PZG
    Paramount Gold Nevada
    -- -- -- -$2.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns EMN or XPL?

    Solitario Resources has a net margin of 7.95% compared to Eastman Chemical's net margin of --. Eastman Chemical's return on equity of 15.99% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    24.76% $1.57 $11B
    XPL
    Solitario Resources
    -- -$0.01 --
  • What do Analysts Say About EMN or XPL?

    Eastman Chemical has a consensus price target of $97.67, signalling upside risk potential of 26.78%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 125.23%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Eastman Chemical, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Eastman Chemical.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    10 5 0
    XPL
    Solitario Resources
    0 0 0
  • Is EMN or XPL More Risky?

    Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.248, which suggesting that the stock is 24.845% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.470, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.985%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMN or XPL?

    Eastman Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.28%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eastman Chemical pays 41.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eastman Chemical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EMN or XPL?

    Eastman Chemical quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Eastman Chemical's net income of $182M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, Eastman Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.80x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical is 0.97x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    0.97x 9.80x $2.3B $182M
    XPL
    Solitario Resources
    -- -- -- -$511K

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will Palantir Crash?
Will Palantir Crash?

AI and data analytics software major Palantir (NASDAQ:PLTR) has been…

Is Target’s Dividend Worth Buying?
Is Target’s Dividend Worth Buying?

Retail giant Target (NYSE:TGT) has been through an extremely volatile…

Where Will AST SpaceMobile Be In 5 Years?
Where Will AST SpaceMobile Be In 5 Years?

Ever tried to send a text from the Nevada desert…

Stock Ideas

Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 41x

Buy
60
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 49x

Sell
37
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Sell
49
RGC alert for Jun 17

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 21.6% over the past day.

Buy
59
SYM alert for Jun 17

Symbotic [SYM] is down 1.69% over the past day.

Sell
43
TNXP alert for Jun 17

Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding [TNXP] is down 4.52% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock