PZG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of -- compared to Paramount Gold Nevada's net margin of 8.77%. Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of -- beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 63.58%.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 259.6%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $24.33 which suggests that it could grow by 28.04%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Century Aluminum.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.854, which suggesting that the stock is 85.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.496, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 149.576%.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Paramount Gold Nevada pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $539.1M. Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $47.3M. Notably, Paramount Gold Nevada's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 6.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Paramount Gold Nevada is -- versus 0.86x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DynaResource has a net margin of -- compared to Paramount Gold Nevada's net margin of -7.77%. Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of -- beat DynaResource's return on equity of -197.22%.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 259.6%. On the other hand DynaResource has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than DynaResource, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than DynaResource.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.854, which suggesting that the stock is 85.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DynaResource has a beta of 0.143, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.676%.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DynaResource offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Paramount Gold Nevada pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DynaResource pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than DynaResource quarterly revenues of $11.2M. Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M is lower than DynaResource's net income of -$870.5K. Notably, Paramount Gold Nevada's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DynaResource's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Paramount Gold Nevada is -- versus 0.61x for DynaResource. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of -- compared to Paramount Gold Nevada's net margin of -0.63%. Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of -- beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32%.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 259.6%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.854, which suggesting that the stock is 85.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.002%.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Paramount Gold Nevada pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $106.8M. Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K. Notably, Paramount Gold Nevada's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 13.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Paramount Gold Nevada is -- versus 0.24x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -- compared to Paramount Gold Nevada's net margin of --. Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of -- beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 259.6%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 151.21%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Solitario Resources, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Solitario Resources.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.854, which suggesting that the stock is 85.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.895, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.55%.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Paramount Gold Nevada pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Paramount Gold Nevada's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Paramount Gold Nevada is -- versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.