WRB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 11.84% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 3.62%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.93% beat Allstate's return on equity of 19.96%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $70.30, signalling downside risk potential of -5.88%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $227.59 which suggests that it could grow by 8.44%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.435, which suggesting that the stock is 56.478% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.325, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.546%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M is lower than Allstate's net income of $595M. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.33x while Allstate's PE ratio is 14.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 2.15x versus 0.86x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 11.84% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of -3.51%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.93% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $70.30, signalling downside risk potential of -5.88%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $152.83 which suggests that it could grow by 1.34%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.435, which suggesting that the stock is 56.478% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.386%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $2.6B. WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M is higher than Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.33x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 16.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 2.15x versus 2.16x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 11.84% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 12.58%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.93% beat Progressive's return on equity of 34.35%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $70.30, signalling downside risk potential of -5.88%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $287.9012 which suggests that it could grow by 1.04%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.435, which suggesting that the stock is 56.478% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.403, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.748%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Progressive offers a yield of 3.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.4B. WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.6B. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.33x while Progressive's PE ratio is 19.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 2.15x versus 2.13x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RLI has a net margin of 11.84% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 15.51%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.93% beat RLI's return on equity of 17.61%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $70.30, signalling downside risk potential of -5.88%. On the other hand RLI has an analysts' consensus of $78.25 which suggests that it could grow by 1.8%. Given that RLI has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe RLI is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.435, which suggesting that the stock is 56.478% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RLI has a beta of 0.721, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.894%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. RLI offers a yield of 0.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. RLI pays out 68.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than RLI quarterly revenues of $407.7M. WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M is higher than RLI's net income of $63.2M. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.33x while RLI's PE ratio is 25.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 2.15x versus 4.10x for RLI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.