WRB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 10.83% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 24.7%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.53% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 24.78%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $64.13, signalling upside risk potential of 9.24%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $156.33 which suggests that it could grow by 7.62%. Given that WR Berkley has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe WR Berkley is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.649, which suggesting that the stock is 35.058% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.692, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.78%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. WR Berkley pays 36.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 24.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $3.3B. WR Berkley's net income of $365.6M is lower than Cincinnati Financial's net income of $820M. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.04x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 7.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 1.80x versus 1.89x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Markel Group has a net margin of 10.83% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 20.11%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.53% beat Markel Group's return on equity of 18.44%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $64.13, signalling upside risk potential of 9.24%. On the other hand Markel Group has an analysts' consensus of $1,672.67 which suggests that it could fall by -3.27%. Given that WR Berkley has higher upside potential than Markel Group, analysts believe WR Berkley is more attractive than Markel Group.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.649, which suggesting that the stock is 35.058% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Markel Group has a beta of 0.772, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.764%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Markel Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WR Berkley pays 36.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Markel Group pays out 1.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than Markel Group quarterly revenues of $4.5B. WR Berkley's net income of $365.6M is lower than Markel Group's net income of $905M. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.04x while Markel Group's PE ratio is 8.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 1.80x versus 1.33x for Markel Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 10.83% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 11.84%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.53% beat Progressive's return on equity of 36.88%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $64.13, signalling upside risk potential of 9.24%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $276.5625 which suggests that it could grow by 13.7%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.649, which suggesting that the stock is 35.058% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.988%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Progressive offers a yield of 0.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. WR Berkley pays 36.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 7.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $19.7B. WR Berkley's net income of $365.6M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.3B. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.04x while Progressive's PE ratio is 17.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 1.80x versus 1.99x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RLI has a net margin of 10.83% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 20.22%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.53% beat RLI's return on equity of 27.72%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $64.13, signalling upside risk potential of 9.24%. On the other hand RLI has an analysts' consensus of $184.60 which suggests that it could grow by 11.68%. Given that RLI has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe RLI is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.649, which suggesting that the stock is 35.058% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RLI has a beta of 0.457, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.344%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. RLI offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.29 per share. WR Berkley pays 36.3% of its earnings as a dividend. RLI pays out 45.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than RLI quarterly revenues of $470M. WR Berkley's net income of $365.6M is higher than RLI's net income of $95M. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.04x while RLI's PE ratio is 18.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 1.80x versus 4.34x for RLI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.