AON Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Horace Mann Educators has a net margin of 20.41% compared to Aon PLC's net margin of 9.55%. Aon PLC's return on equity of 48.52% beat Horace Mann Educators's return on equity of 9.03%.

Aon PLC has a consensus price target of $396.07, signalling upside risk potential of 11.66%. On the other hand Horace Mann Educators has an analysts' consensus of $46.50 which suggests that it could grow by 10.35%. Given that Aon PLC has higher upside potential than Horace Mann Educators, analysts believe Aon PLC is more attractive than Horace Mann Educators.

Aon PLC has a beta of 0.863, which suggesting that the stock is 13.702% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Horace Mann Educators has a beta of 0.280, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.97%.

Aon PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.78%. Horace Mann Educators offers a yield of 3.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Aon PLC pays 21.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Horace Mann Educators pays out 53.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aon PLC quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Horace Mann Educators quarterly revenues of $400.1M. Aon PLC's net income of $965M is higher than Horace Mann Educators's net income of $38.2M. Notably, Aon PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.21x while Horace Mann Educators's PE ratio is 15.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aon PLC is 4.70x versus 1.11x for Horace Mann Educators. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MGIC Investment has a net margin of 20.41% compared to Aon PLC's net margin of 60.56%. Aon PLC's return on equity of 48.52% beat MGIC Investment's return on equity of 14.99%.

Aon PLC has a consensus price target of $396.07, signalling upside risk potential of 11.66%. On the other hand MGIC Investment has an analysts' consensus of $27.00 which suggests that it could fall by -0.07%. Given that Aon PLC has higher upside potential than MGIC Investment, analysts believe Aon PLC is more attractive than MGIC Investment.

Aon PLC has a beta of 0.863, which suggesting that the stock is 13.702% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MGIC Investment has a beta of 0.895, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.523%.

Aon PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.78%. MGIC Investment offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Aon PLC pays 21.18% of its earnings as a dividend. MGIC Investment pays out 17.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aon PLC quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than MGIC Investment quarterly revenues of $306.2M. Aon PLC's net income of $965M is higher than MGIC Investment's net income of $185.5M. Notably, Aon PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.21x while MGIC Investment's PE ratio is 8.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aon PLC is 4.70x versus 5.70x for MGIC Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 20.41% compared to Aon PLC's net margin of 12.58%. Aon PLC's return on equity of 48.52% beat Progressive's return on equity of 34.35%.

Aon PLC has a consensus price target of $396.07, signalling upside risk potential of 11.66%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $291.0178 which suggests that it could grow by 10.97%. Given that Aon PLC has higher upside potential than Progressive, analysts believe Aon PLC is more attractive than Progressive.

Aon PLC has a beta of 0.863, which suggesting that the stock is 13.702% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.399, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.146%.

Aon PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.78%. Progressive offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Aon PLC pays 21.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aon PLC quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.4B. Aon PLC's net income of $965M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.6B. Notably, Aon PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.21x while Progressive's PE ratio is 17.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aon PLC is 4.70x versus 1.96x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a net margin of 20.41% compared to Aon PLC's net margin of 4.92%. Aon PLC's return on equity of 48.52% beat RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 9.77%.

Aon PLC has a consensus price target of $396.07, signalling upside risk potential of 11.66%. On the other hand RenaissanceRe Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $277.82 which suggests that it could grow by 13.59%. Given that RenaissanceRe Holdings has higher upside potential than Aon PLC, analysts believe RenaissanceRe Holdings is more attractive than Aon PLC.

Aon PLC has a beta of 0.863, which suggesting that the stock is 13.702% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.312, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.803%.

Aon PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.78%. RenaissanceRe Holdings offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Aon PLC pays 21.18% of its earnings as a dividend. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays out 6.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aon PLC quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Aon PLC's net income of $965M is higher than RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of $170M. Notably, Aon PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.21x while RenaissanceRe Holdings's PE ratio is 7.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aon PLC is 4.70x versus 0.99x for RenaissanceRe Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.