AEE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Entergy has a net margin of 13.78% compared to Ameren's net margin of 12.73%. Ameren's return on equity of 10.12% beat Entergy's return on equity of 9%.

Ameren has a consensus price target of $103.41, signalling upside risk potential of 7.89%. On the other hand Entergy has an analysts' consensus of $89.05 which suggests that it could grow by 8.4%. Given that Entergy has higher upside potential than Ameren, analysts believe Entergy is more attractive than Ameren.

Ameren has a beta of 0.489, which suggesting that the stock is 51.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Entergy has a beta of 0.596, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.42%.

Ameren has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. Entergy offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Ameren pays 60.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Entergy pays out 94.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ameren quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Entergy quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Ameren's net income of $289M is lower than Entergy's net income of $362.4M. Notably, Ameren's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.25x while Entergy's PE ratio is 26.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ameren is 3.26x versus 2.99x for Entergy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exelon has a net margin of 13.78% compared to Ameren's net margin of 13.52%. Ameren's return on equity of 10.12% beat Exelon's return on equity of 10.16%.

Ameren has a consensus price target of $103.41, signalling upside risk potential of 7.89%. On the other hand Exelon has an analysts' consensus of $47.23 which suggests that it could grow by 10.14%. Given that Exelon has higher upside potential than Ameren, analysts believe Exelon is more attractive than Ameren.

Ameren has a beta of 0.489, which suggesting that the stock is 51.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exelon has a beta of 0.391, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.885%.

Ameren has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. Exelon offers a yield of 3.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Ameren pays 60.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Exelon pays out 61.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ameren quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Exelon quarterly revenues of $6.7B. Ameren's net income of $289M is lower than Exelon's net income of $908M. Notably, Ameren's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.25x while Exelon's PE ratio is 15.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ameren is 3.26x versus 1.82x for Exelon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vistra has a net margin of 13.78% compared to Ameren's net margin of -6.81%. Ameren's return on equity of 10.12% beat Vistra's return on equity of 36.03%.

Ameren has a consensus price target of $103.41, signalling upside risk potential of 7.89%. On the other hand Vistra has an analysts' consensus of $167.08 which suggests that it could grow by 1.76%. Given that Ameren has higher upside potential than Vistra, analysts believe Ameren is more attractive than Vistra.

Ameren has a beta of 0.489, which suggesting that the stock is 51.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vistra has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.537%.

Ameren has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. Vistra offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Ameren pays 60.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra pays out 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ameren quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Vistra quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Ameren's net income of $289M is higher than Vistra's net income of -$268M. Notably, Ameren's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.25x while Vistra's PE ratio is 25.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ameren is 3.26x versus 3.17x for Vistra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WEC Energy Group has a net margin of 13.78% compared to Ameren's net margin of 23%. Ameren's return on equity of 10.12% beat WEC Energy Group's return on equity of 12.85%.

Ameren has a consensus price target of $103.41, signalling upside risk potential of 7.89%. On the other hand WEC Energy Group has an analysts' consensus of $109.55 which suggests that it could grow by 3.75%. Given that Ameren has higher upside potential than WEC Energy Group, analysts believe Ameren is more attractive than WEC Energy Group.

Ameren has a beta of 0.489, which suggesting that the stock is 51.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WEC Energy Group has a beta of 0.450, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.955%.

Ameren has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. WEC Energy Group offers a yield of 3.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share. Ameren pays 60.41% of its earnings as a dividend. WEC Energy Group pays out 69.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ameren quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than WEC Energy Group quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Ameren's net income of $289M is lower than WEC Energy Group's net income of $724.5M. Notably, Ameren's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.25x while WEC Energy Group's PE ratio is 20.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ameren is 3.26x versus 3.69x for WEC Energy Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.