AEE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Consolidated Edison has a net margin of 20.99% compared to Ameren's net margin of 14.37%. Ameren's return on equity of 9.79% beat Consolidated Edison's return on equity of 8.59%.

Ameren has a consensus price target of $90.94, signalling upside risk potential of 1.4%. On the other hand Consolidated Edison has an analysts' consensus of $99.88 which suggests that it could grow by 11.38%. Given that Consolidated Edison has higher upside potential than Ameren, analysts believe Consolidated Edison is more attractive than Ameren.

Ameren has a beta of 0.477, which suggesting that the stock is 52.324% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Consolidated Edison has a beta of 0.363, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.696%.

Ameren has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. Consolidated Edison offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Ameren pays 57.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Consolidated Edison pays out 43.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ameren quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Consolidated Edison quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Ameren's net income of $456M is lower than Consolidated Edison's net income of $588M. Notably, Ameren's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.10x while Consolidated Edison's PE ratio is 16.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ameren is 3.27x versus 2.07x for Consolidated Edison. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southern has a net margin of 20.99% compared to Ameren's net margin of 21.1%. Ameren's return on equity of 9.79% beat Southern's return on equity of 13.18%.

Ameren has a consensus price target of $90.94, signalling upside risk potential of 1.4%. On the other hand Southern has an analysts' consensus of $91.38 which suggests that it could grow by 9.98%. Given that Southern has higher upside potential than Ameren, analysts believe Southern is more attractive than Ameren.

Ameren has a beta of 0.477, which suggesting that the stock is 52.324% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southern has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.333%.

Ameren has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. Southern offers a yield of 3.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Ameren pays 57.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Southern pays out 76.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ameren quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Southern quarterly revenues of $7.3B. Ameren's net income of $456M is lower than Southern's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Ameren's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.10x while Southern's PE ratio is 19.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ameren is 3.27x versus 3.46x for Southern. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talen Energy has a net margin of 20.99% compared to Ameren's net margin of 30.27%. Ameren's return on equity of 9.79% beat Talen Energy's return on equity of --.

Ameren has a consensus price target of $90.94, signalling upside risk potential of 1.4%. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $120.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.59%. Given that Talen Energy has higher upside potential than Ameren, analysts believe Talen Energy is more attractive than Ameren.

Ameren has a beta of 0.477, which suggesting that the stock is 52.324% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ameren has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ameren pays 57.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ameren's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ameren quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $555M. Ameren's net income of $456M is higher than Talen Energy's net income of $168M. Notably, Ameren's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.10x while Talen Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ameren is 3.27x versus -- for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vistra has a net margin of 20.99% compared to Ameren's net margin of 30.03%. Ameren's return on equity of 9.79% beat Vistra's return on equity of --.

Ameren has a consensus price target of $90.94, signalling upside risk potential of 1.4%. On the other hand Vistra has an analysts' consensus of $160.46 which suggests that it could grow by 13.97%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than Ameren, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than Ameren.

Ameren has a beta of 0.477, which suggesting that the stock is 52.324% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vistra has a beta of 1.160, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.026%.

Ameren has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. Vistra offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Ameren pays 57.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra pays out 31.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ameren quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Vistra quarterly revenues of $6.3B. Ameren's net income of $456M is lower than Vistra's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Ameren's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.10x while Vistra's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ameren is 3.27x versus -- for Vistra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.